The Bible is God's Word - Lutheran Style

Check This Blog Site

2012-01-05T10:50:00.002-05:00

I am reading The Last Superstition by Edward Feser. Wow, what an amazing intellect. Check out more about him at his blogspot.http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/

Intelligent Design?

2011-11-23T09:09:00.001-05:00

I was taught evolutionary biology in the ninth grade. I accepted it as fact. While I managed to hold to faith and not allow Darwinian Evolution interfere with my belief in God as Creator, it always troubled me that random mutations are the explanation for life. It seems almost ludicrous to suggest that we emerged from ooze. New research into the DNA and the life of a cell indicate renewed interest in the concept of Intelligent Design. Such thinkers as William Dembski and Stephen Meyer (Signature in the Cell) offer overwhelming arguments that life did not originate by random mutations over millions of years, but has an intelligent designer. God created the heavens and the earth and we are His supreme creation. Somehow the ooze just does not seem so intelligible anymore. I suggest viewing the youtube videos on "the inner life of the cell." Also, check out Francis Collins or the Discovery Institute. Both offer very different views of the origin of life, but both come at it from Christian perspectives. Most fascinating.

A Conundrum?

2011-09-30T19:25:00.001-04:00

A friend from another denomination requested we meet over lunch to discuss baptism. He could not understand our practice of infant baptism. A healthy and robust dialog ended up with no agreement. Over the years he and I shared many lunches and even spent a weekend kayaking and camping. Friendship trumped our disagreements. As time passed, however, he came to understand the sacrament of Holy Communion in a distinctively Lutheran way. This presented him with a dilemma. How do you preach in a non-Lutheran denomination an article of faith as defined in the Lutheran Confessions? Now I find myself facing a similar dilemma. How do I preach the faith of the Holy Scriptures when my own denomination’s official stance has turned ordination into nothing more than a civil right? How do we continue our faithfulness in claiming Jesus as the exclusive Son of God when universalism creeps into documents? Consider for example the annotation in the Lutheran Study Bible beside the Great Commission of Jesus in Matthew 28. This note was later changed after a ground swell of complaint. Note, however, that 30,000 of our youth were given a bible that includes a note stating, “Jesus does not mean for us to make disciples of all people.” How do we inculcate in our parishioners the urgency of the gospel and the need for all people to hear the good news of Jesus Christ when our national Bishop grants an Imam an opportunity to address the ELCA Churchwide Assembly and then embraces him on the stage yet the Missouri Synod representative was not asked to speak? How do we proclaim the “scandal of particularity” of Jesus when the National Lutheran magazine carries an article celebrating Lakeview Lutheran’s service in which they give thanks together with Wiccans, Hindus, Buddhist and Unitarians among so many others? When do people become outraged over the inherent goddess worship as demonstrated by www.herchurch.org? Is there any length to which this churchwide Bishop will go to drive away traditional Christians? And when will the traditional Christians wake up and smell the foul brewing coffee? But you say this is the Church. I remind you that Bishop Crumley in his address to the first large gathering of the Orthodox Lutherans of South Carolina stated that since the ELCA was in violation of its own constitution then this calls into question whether or not it is the church. What will it take for the ordinary lay person to ask why Bishop Hanson is so ecstatic now that he knows the clear direction this church is taking? What direction is that? Everyone is included no matter what? No wrath? No repentance? No sin? No Law and thus no real gospel? When will people realize that this is no longer “Our Father’s” faith? The dialog will not stop as long as I am in the ELCA. I will prod and question and do what I was called to do. Preach and teach in accordance with scripture not the ELCA.

Jesus

2011-09-29T11:23:00.001-04:00

Check out my latest publication, Jesus -The Transforming Power of the Messiah. It is available on Amazon or you can order it from your local bookstore. My intent in writing this book is to give you forty days of readings that focus on Jesus and his power to change our lives. It is also available for Kindle for 9.99 in instant download. You can preview the book on Amazon as well.

Wasting Money is Poor Stewardship!

2011-09-27T13:55:00.001-04:00

What is Going on in the World?

2011-08-15T22:53:00.000-04:00

What is going on in the World? Consider the riots in London.

Britain

is a peaceful and proud nation. This past week the streets of London were on fire. What is most troubling about this incident is that this is beginning to happen here.

Peggy Noonan writing for the Wall Street Journal said, “What does this have to do with America? What we’re seeing on the streets in

Britain

right now is something we may be starting to see here. It is a conflagration, but it is out there, and I think it is growing. And as in

Britain

, it doesn’t have anything to do with political grievances per se.”

Mrs. Noonan continues by pointing to the large number of children with little parental oversight. What she observes, and we know to be true as well, is there are a large growing number of people, both young and old, who are disobedient and disrespectful. Parents who thumb their noses at the law and the children are watching.

Apparently flash mobs show up at retail establishments as one did in Philadelphia. Hundreds show up at one time and steal everything in the store. They leave quickly with little or no consequences.

Is this the kind of society we want? One without rules, one empty of penalties, one looking the other way when wrongs are committed, and worse yet a society in which no-one is outraged at the assault on our just laws. The prophet Isaiah, like all the other prophets of the scripture, spoke plainly and clearly. This is what the Lord says, “Maintain justice and do what is right, for my salvation is close at hand and my righteousness will soon be revealed.”

Have we lost our heart as God’s people? Are we immune to the injustices? Wrong is wrong. While our congress and president fuss over billions and trillions, children are starving by the thousands in

Somalia

, not to mention other African nations affected by famine and drought. Some report that nearly 500,000 children are on the brink of starvation.

Now let me be clear. We are a generous people. We have donated hundreds of millions to relief agencies. We cannot eliminate all the corrupt governments of the world either, but there is unrest all over the world and why? Back to my original question, “What is going on in the world?”

In one word – sin. Sin is in government. Sin is in cities. Sin is in homes. Sin is in our hearts. This sin originated at the beginning of time and there is only one solution – Jesus. I believe that there is only one who brings eternal life. I believe there is only one who redeems people. I believe there is only one in who true salvation and righteousness can be found. Jesus is Messiah. He is the one anointed by the eternal one God to restore justice, reform hearts and minds and renew the face of the earth.

One of the ways our God does this is by establishing outposts around the world, centers of justice and righteousness, places where people can gather and learn how to live. What is the name of this place? House of Prayer – or as you and I often say – the church.

I think it is time that the Church takes back its place as the center of our nations place for learning justice, righteousness and living the respectful and obedient life. It is time for our churches to be the church in the world. It is time, if unlike any other time in our history for us to roll up our servant sleeves and share love, unbelievable love, unshakable love, amazing love, the love of God in Christ Jesus. The kind of love that transforms lives one child at a time.

We have children in our midst. God has given us a huge responsibility to shape their lives. Someone said that the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.

Well the hands that have been rocking the cradle as of late are watching as London burns and thousands of children starve. What is happening in our world is a death of outrage for sinful behavior and an apathetic belief in the power of Jesus to transform lives. Let us not be deterred by the many voices that offer only half solutions, but let us commit ourselves to be a House of Prayer for all nations.

Let us be a House of Prayer where people serve the Lord, love the name of the Lord, worship the lord, keep the Sabbath and respect the rule of God’s laws. Let us hold fast to God’s covenants. Let us have joy, effervescent joy in the House of the Lord. Let us be so bold that God begins to gather a force of his people together to flash mob the world with both the Law of God and the Good News of Jesus Christ. And let it begin with each of us, one small grace-filled step at a time.

Beauty on the Ragged Edge?

2011-07-19T17:05:00.001-04:00

The Lutheran magazine is the voice of the ELCA. The July edition contains an article by Ingrid Chenowerth entitled, Beauty on the edges. In it she states, "One thing I know is that the ELCA will continue to have room for those who, like me, may be edge people. People who don't fit comfortably into the boxes that society tries to impose. People who enjoy being around all kinds of different people and who value the richness that diversity offers." What does this mean? She continues, "The church needs both its center and its irregular, imperfect edges in order to be able to hold together and to embrace the irregular, imperfectly beautiful people of God." I thought the church only needed the gospel of Jesus Christ to hold together. I thought the church needed both truth and grace, law and gospel, clear boundaries that define what is acceptable behavior for those who aspire to the high calling of discipleship. Or, is it rather that we just need to include everyone no matter what? Everyone is welcome and everyone belongs and every behavior is condoned, is that what holds the church together? While I commend her for attempting to make everyone feel good for how good we are in our efforts at inclusion, and while I commend her for her ability to put one word after another in a creative and inspirational way, the fundamental premise is deeply flawed. The diversity called for is not really about people, but ideas. Even the Presbyterians recently decided that they value different theological convictions and beliefs in their midst. What is the point of the Westminster Confession of Faith or the Augsburg Confession of Faith, if not to clearly detail our firm convictions and beliefs. Gospel reductionism is her flaw. And it is rampant in the church. I am on the edge as well, but it is now an unwelcome and unwanted edge!

Marriage in New York

2011-06-30T14:52:00.000-04:00

I protest the new law in New York and pray that folks will educate themselves to why South Carolina should never do what New York has done. The following link will take you to an article that says it all.

Marriage Laws in New York

What if Christ was Raised?

2011-06-05T21:32:00.000-04:00

As a result of an overemphasis on the historical – critical method of biblical study, an all out theological assault through such scholars as Rudolf Bultmann has sought to downplay and demythologize Jesus’ bodily resurrection. N. T. Wright in his voluminous work, “The Resurrection of the Son of God,” provides the most thorough orthodox treatment of resurrection in which he underscores the empty tomb and the appearances of Jesus as the only plausible explanation for what happened. I find it noteworthy that the world’s most well known atheist, Antony Flew has changed his mind to Theism. In his book, “There is A God,” he includes an appendix written by none other than N.T. Wright about, what would you guess, the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

If Christ was not raised, then we might as well close all of our churches and spend our money on more fruitful pursuits. As the Apostle Paul said, “If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied.” (1 Corinthians 15: 19) But if Christ was raised from the dead, then all of history is changed forever. It might be entirely possible that American Christianity with its “therapeutic moralistic deism,”[i] has accepted a Bultmann theology. We are using Jesus for our pursuit of pleasure or profit because deep down we doubt the reality of the resurrection. But what if we believed it fully and completely? Would it not change our church programs and our style of sharing the good news of Jesus?

What if we decided to believe with full passion the power of the resurrection of Jesus Christ? Debunk all mythological approaches and accept several simple premises. First, Jesus died a real death. Second, Jesus rose from death in a body that walked through walls, but also ate fish. Third, Jesus appeared in bodily form to many people, people like you and me. Will you believe this? Will you allow this powerful news to take root in your life and shape you in new ways? Will you realize with your will, intellect and emotion that the Holy Spirit can grant you this faith? Believe it and live it.

[i] This is a phrase coined by Michael Horton in Christless Christianity

Prayers Continued...

2011-04-02T07:24:00.000-04:00

Here is a petition from ELCA's Sundays and Seasons, "We pray for those who are homeless and outcast; for those suffering from malaria or HIV/AIDS; for those with mental or physical disabilities." Compare with this petition from the LCMS, "Welcoming God, Your Son's embrace of the outcast was limitless. Break down all the barriers that would keep us from sharing Your acceptance and love with others and help us to treasure and value each person as one who is precious to You through Your Son's sacrifice." While the first petition from ELCA is alright, notice how the petition says, "We pray for." The second petition makes a bold and strong request, "Break down all the barriers." Perhaps there is a guiding principle for petitions in ELCA in which each petition merely states what the community is to pray for, whereas the LCMS petitions each could stand alone as a prayer in and of themselves. For instance ELCA petitions do not have an address of God. This may be a nice way to avoid "Father." Personally, I find the ELCA petitions more and more filled with the agendas of special interest groups and less and less of a call to repentance and sanctification. For instance, the last petition of this same Sunday had these words in the ELCA petitions, "You know everything we have ever done, and still you love us." Again, nothing untrue about that statement as God knows everything and He still does love us, but is it true that, "I'm Ok and You're Ok." Why not something like, "Creator God, You know everything we have ever done, and still you love us. Call us to our knees to repent of those sins which destroy our love for you." I am going to look for words such as sin, Father, repentance, redemption, holiness, and sanctification in the published prayer petitions. Think I will see them?

Remarks at St. Stephens Gathering

2011-03-13T21:34:00.000-04:00

You can find Bishop Jim Crumley's remarks at the link pasted below.

Remarks of Jim Crumley

Bishops Academy Notes

2011-03-13T21:24:00.000-04:00

Dr. Walter Taylor presented these eleven points to the Conference of Bishops on January 6, 2011. Each of these points should be preceded by - What did not happen.
1. What did not happen - adequate use of the bible, especially the Old Testament
2. " A clear, full statement of the biblical foundations for marriage
3. " study and reflection- even refutation - of the texts on homosexuality that normally come into play
4. " normal historical study of Acts 10:9-16
5. " use of the Bible when trying to build a positive case for acceptance of same-sex relationships
6. " an acceptable definition of the neighbor's need
7. " adequate understanding and use of the Law
8. " the need for a savior adequately stated
9. " a positive biblical and theological understanding of being single
10. " attempt to resolve hermeneutical issues
11." adequate foundation for bound conscience

These are the points presented, but all the notes and bullet points are not included here. I will see if there is time to later include it all. This should be transparent and publicly available information for any and all in the ELCA. Truthfully, this merely serves to illustrate the absolutely sloppy theology at work.

What is a Vow?

2011-03-12T19:22:00.000-05:00

What is a vow? It is a promise. Specifically, it is our honor and duty to uphold our pledge as ordained servants of the church of Jesus Christ to preach and teach in accordance with Holy Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions. I have several other vows to which I hold allegiance with great joy. I made a personal commitment to care for my family. This is not some civic duty or a general bit of wisdom that all people know to be true, but it is the command of Holy Scripture. Timothy gives this charge in chapter three of the first book. We are to manage our families well. The second joyful solemn promise is to my wife of nearly thirty years. She is a vitally important part of the ordained ministry God entrusted to me. A third and final vow is better known as a “Call.” The congregation which I am privileged to serve is a vibrant, exciting and promising place. God called me to serve in this place and I intend to fulfill my vow. This, however, is where the consternation starts. The ELCA is in violation of its vow to the Scripture. I refer again to the words of Pastor Jim Crumley, former Bishop of the LCA when he wrote,

“I conclude that there is no evidence based on the text of Scripture which permits or mandates the change as stated in the new policy adopted at the assembly. The action rather was unconstitutional and violated a part of the Confession of Faith. On that basis, the appropriate question is whether the ELCA is still without question a faithful and confessing church. I conclude that the ELCA has placed itself in a precarious position. Can I recognize my membership as authentic and God-serving in the fullest and truest sense?”

The conference of Bishops in 1993 issued a statement which said,

"There is basis neither in Scripture nor tradition for the establishment of an official ceremony by this church for the blessing of a homosexual relationship. We, therefore, do not approve such a ceremony as an official action of this church's ministry;"

It is quite amazing that in a mere sixteen years we could completely reverse a decision so fully unsupported by any biblical argument at all. And now at a recent meeting (January 6, 2011) of the ELCA Bishops held in Tampa, Florida Dr. Walter Taylor, an Old Testament professor made a presentation in which he reiterated what did not happen at the Churchwide Assembly in 2009. What did not happen – 1) adequate use of the Bible, especially the Old Testament, 2) a clear, full statement of the biblical foundations for marriage, 3) and study and reflection – even refutation – of the texts on homosexuality that normally come into play. Dr. Taylor made eleven such points. My simple question is this; did the ELCA study homosexuality and the experience of all those who have same gender attractions when we conducted Journey Together Faithfully or did we study the scripture? Guess which one we did. And if you think we studied scripture, please post your comments and point me to the exact place. Why else would the Bishops Academy ask a theologian to address the negative reactions to HSGT? This ship has no rudder!

So, I will keep my vows, but as for the ELCA I have to ask the same question as Bishop Jim Crumley, “Can I recognize my membership as authentic and God-serving in the fullest and truest sense?” As to any vows to be a cheerleader for the ELCA, that is one I must break. On this I take my stand. I can do no other. God help me.

Every Pew!

2011-03-09T20:30:00.000-05:00

So, what are we to make of what is going on in every pew in the ELCA? I know and I am sure many of you do as well of congregations that are embroiled in a war of words over what might seem to some a mere matter of sex. But there is so much more going on in the ELCA. There are many fringe groups and radical voices in the ELCA. Sadly, some of their noise is being heard and because none want to talk about sin, we pretend that it is no big deal. Or as I heard recently the charge is made that those who leave the ELCA are “literalists” and they are the folks who use the word inerrant to describe the scripture. While that is not true, though there are some that are the inerrancy folks, there is a definitive and strong defense of orthodox biblical interpretation in the book, “Seeking New Directions for Lutheranism,” available at www.alpb.org. I highly recommend it. But let us be real for a moment. Ordination is not a right for all who want it, but a sacred order of the church for those who will live a life in accord with the good news of Jesus and his transforming power. If you do not wish to live a life of repentance, then stay out of the office of pastor. Any pastor who engages in sexual activity outside of the holy bonds of a marriage of one man and one woman is committing adultery. And any pastor who thinks that their sexual relationship (other than that of the marriage of one man and one woman) is normative and part of the good created order of God is fooling themselves and dishonoring ordination and dishonoring God. They will be held accountable to God for teaching a different gospel and the Apostle Paul says something clear about that in Galatians 1:8. Frankly, I am astonished that so many can be led astray so easily. But then again I remember that the ELCA leaders made a pact to get this done with means that were less than godly or fair or transparent. I will not rehash what they did as it has been published elsewhere. The reason, however, that people are upset is this is about the gospel. As Dr. Yeago wrote, “what the law demands the gospel bestows.” If we cannot agree on what the law demands in regard to a holy and moral life, then we cannot agree on what the gospel bestows and if we cannot agree on what the gospel bestows then logically we are not in agreement about what the gospel is. This is serious. Since it is Ash Wednesday, perhaps all of us who believe that the ELCA decisions are wrong should pray fervently for change. I will in a focused way for forty days. How about you?

The Best of Times and The Worst of Times?

2011-01-11T17:12:00.000-05:00

Just exactly what are we to do in the midst of this family quarrel? A recent visit to the blogspot of David Barnhart which listed all of the congregations holding votes to leave the ELCA listed one congregation of a seminary classmate and dear friend. This was not shocking to me, but it caused me great pause. His votes were very close and will no doubt cause pain for all involved. In South Carolina we are addressing the confessional crisis with the formation of the Orthodox Lutherans of South Carolina. Even this effort has caused consternation among some who have spoken less than kindly about our affiliation. So what are we to do? Clearly, the ELCA's issues are far more than an obsession with matters sexual. The one word that summarizes the problems with our church is trust. I, and many others, feel that the trust is broken and may even be beyond restoration. When I read of the votes I can only attest that is the best of times and the worst of times. In the best sense congregations will have to determine just what it is they believe. While in the worst sense, families of faith are split. This is a hard time to be in the ELCA. I pray for all of those who are displaced.

MERRY CHRISTMAS

2010-12-25T08:11:00.001-05:00

For all those families who will gather, may God bless your fellowship with grace, love and peace. Enjoy the food and listen to some great Christmas music. And as for Christmas music, check out the music of Jacob Johnson. He is a young Christian with amazing ability on the guitar, just amazing.

For Those Who Left

2010-12-14T17:07:00.001-05:00

Thank you Lee (you know who you are) and so many others for being our friends, colleagues, fellow travelers in faith and partners in ministry. Though you have left the ELCA and have said good-bye to cherished friends, ministries to which you belonged, buildings you helped maintain and programs to which you gave your tithes, you are very much a part of our lives. We completely understand that you can no longer affiliate with us in this denominational boat called the ELCA. Some of you are sailing in Roman Catholic waters, while others of you are helping to steer the sails among the Lutheran Church- Missouri Synod, NALC or LCMC. Others, I fear, have simply decided there is no place to go and are agonizing daily over where they can hear the word preached in purity. I understand that you do not wish to be contributors to promote teachings that confuse law and gospel so easily. We miss you, but are thankful that our paths crossed. As Lee said to me recently, "I will pray for you." I needed to hear that. I and many of my colleagues are merely trying to do that which we promised to do, but find ourselves traveling in troubled waters. We are being faithful to our calling to serve the people God called us to serve. We are preaching the Holy Scriptures with full humility and repentance. Sadly, it seems that every day I see ever clearer that the fracture is wide and deep and the boat may be sinking, but we are here to speak the grace and truth that God's people need to hear.

Theological Tenure?

2010-11-20T08:16:00.001-05:00

My grandfather and father were both welders who worked for Southern Railway. Both were employed many years and enjoyed decent working conditions, excellent pay and fantastic benefits. While their work was not guaranteed, unions virtually assured protection from unnecessary and sometimes necessary release from employment. It was not, however, advisable to approach work with a slothful attitude. Other workers did not look favorably upon such behavior. American academic institutions have encouraged misguided initiative. Tenure is an old idea that needs to be challenged at the very least in theological schools. Currently, nearly every ELCA seminary has welcomed, adopted and promoted doctrinal interpretations far from the mainstream of the laity. Take the new statement HSGT (Human Sexuality Gift and Trust), for example. This is widely endorsed by most if not all of our seminaries. LTSS professors posted a website entitled the Columbia Declaration which includes full endorsement and, I might add, an incorrect statement in which it uses the word bless for unions. The word bless is never used in HSGT. Not that rules or boundaries really matter for the newly enlightened. Tenure insures that these professors can teach whatever they wish with no accountability to the stakeholders – better known as those who write their checks for their churches from which benevolent dollars are used to pay for these heresies. Yes I am going to use that word heresy because that is what it is when leaders teach that the Holy Scripture does not apply to this situation. An article in the Wall Street Journal (Nov. 20, 2010) entitled, “How to Succeed in Teaching Without Lifetime Tenure,” recounts the efforts of a small engineering school to focus on outcomes. This school, Franklin W. Olin college of engineering, is ranked 8^th by U.S. News and World Report. The columnist writes, “In the meantime, Olin is showing what's possible when a school sheds tenure, one of the most antiquated and counterproductive employment policies in the American economy.” We need theological schools that teach Holy Scripture and nothing but Holy Scripture. I am a stakeholder and I do not appreciate that my dollars support exploratory new age enlightened teachings. Sadly, and with much regret, fewer of my dollars will be given to LTSS my alma mater. Gladly, however, I will send charitable gifts to Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary where I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that orthodoxy is valued and expected. Professors sign a statement agreeing to adhere to the Scripture and no such thing as the Columbia Declaration would be tolerated. If, however, LTSS and the other seminaries wish to continue on this path, by all means knock yourselves out, but do it without my money and my prayerful support. Or, better yet, let us put in place accountability in which any teaching that varies from the orthodoxy of Christianity will be forbidden and professors that wish to teach new age garbage can do so when they find someone willing to pay them.

Redistribution of Wealth

2010-11-19T10:28:00.000-05:00

When Luther wrote the Small Catechism to instruct laity and clergy in the basics of the Christian faith, I doubt he had in mind applications to economic systems. It is, however, interesting to reflect on our current political climate and the class warfare rhetoric. These conversations pit one group of people against another. The last presidential election coined the phrase, “redistribution of wealth.” Then, interestingly enough, an everyday plumber made national headlines by challenging this philosophy. This political strategy is used often as it tries to fire up the passion of the poor against the rich. While it is imperative that Christians influence the markets and insist that compassion be a fundamental value of market economies, it is also necessary that we not antagonize or demonize persons with entrepreneurial gifts. While I have criticized the excess pay of coaches at public universities, I support a completely free market economy. Luther's words from the Small Catechism do have something to say about how we should treat those who have more wealth than we do. He wrote this to explain the seventh commandment, “We should fear and love God that we may not take our neighbor's money or property, nor get them by false ware or dealing, but help him to improve and protect his property and business [that his means are preserved and his condition is improved].” How do we help our neighbor improve and protect his or her property? We certainly do not improve it by bludgeoning the rich and attempting to implement some sort of socialist state. While I doubt there is any heavenly economy, Capitalism accounts for human nature as it really is, totally depraved and filled with greed. When government intrudes too much, as has been the case with the last eighteen months, we see chaos, unemployment, and people suffering needlessly. There is a place for accountability and checks and balances in our economic system, but biased government intrusion is nothing more than an attempt to play god. So, if we are serious about helping our neighbor then all of our congressman and elected leaders should simply stay out of our economy. Businesses big and small are composed of people who will exercise their compassion for their neighbor and insure that the economy does what it should do, provide meaningful work and a sustainable income.

Let the Spin Begin

2010-11-15T07:32:00.000-05:00

The Lutheran magazine editorial called the NALC leaders schismatic. This is the pot calling the kettle black. Schismatic is breaking with the tradition of the entire church. The ELCA reports on congregation's leaving and then reports there are still over 10,000 congregations, but what they do not tell you is the hurt and division that is present in nearly every ELCA congregation in the United States. I know of another congregation that had a vote, but the vote failed. The members who voted to leave will either leave the congregation or stay under protest. As one of my clergy friends asked recently at a meeting, "What good has come of this?" From my perspective, absolutely nothing good has come from CWA 09. In fact, perhaps it is fair to say that the excessive liberalism infiltrated in 1988 and built momentum under the guise of being compassionate and working for justice. Time for another Reformation and how about we use a phrase such as "sola scriptura." What a novel idea.

Top 50 Blogs

2010-11-14T22:13:00.001-05:00

Tim Dalton ranked his choice of the Top 50 Blogs and selected this one. Thanks Tim. His link is below. Check it out.

http://theologydegreesonline.com/the-top-50-lutheran-blogs/

Diagnosis - Sin

2010-11-14T22:10:00.000-05:00

Suppose you made a trip to your physician due to a persistent cough. Upon arrival the doctor recommends that you quit smoking. You refuse, but the doctor insists. Finally, the doctor gives up on getting his patient to quit this bad habit. Will the doctor refuse to see the smoking addicted patient? Of course not. Physician's diagnose but continue to treat the patient even when the stubborn patient refuses to cooperate with treatment. Clergy diagnose sin. Many refuse to hear or at best fight bad habits only to fall into the trap of addiction over and over again. The minister does not refuse to welcome or care for the person no matter the sin, but does continue to hold each and every person accountable. Welcoming sinners is what the church does, but not welcoming sin. The Holy Scripture is our only guide for moral behavior. We cannot or should not base our decisions as a church on what people feel or experience. This is faulty and calls into question whether or not we are a church.

Grave of Martin Luther

2010-11-14T21:56:00.000-05:00

This is a picture of the grave of Martin Luther. He is buried in the Castle Church in Wittenberg. Standing here was humbling, but also a deep reminder of the great heritage we have as Lutheran Christians. I will be returning in 2013 to participate in the Wittenberg English Ministry.

2010-11-09T01:07:00.000-05:00

These are the doors on which Luther posted the 95 Theses on the church in Wittenburg, Germany. Thanks to a fantastic gift from the congregation I serve, St. Paul's Lutheran in Columbia, SC, I and my wife enjoyed ten days in Germany touring the Luther sites. The original doors were replaced by these metal doors and the Theses are engraved. It was a cool day and had been raining a bit while we were there.

Call for Humility

2010-10-24T21:09:00.000-04:00

The gospel reading for this Sunday was the parable of the Pharisee and tax collector. One phrase from the sermon today was, "If you leave worship today saying, 'I am glad I am not like that Pharisee,' then you have missed the point of this parable." Jesus did not tell the parable to call us to be more humble in order to be better Christians, but rather to see our need for a savior and thus be humbled. Amidst all the current malaise in Christianity in the United States, may I issue a call for humility.Boisterous and aggressive Christians are not helping the cause of Christ. While I am certainly aware of the time Jesus turned over the tables in the temple, our passion and zeal needs to be tempered with love. There have been more than a few times when I felt the zeal of James the Apostle and wanted to turn over tables at Higgins Road (headquarters for the ELCA), but know also that persuasive theological points made with passion and humility will further our cause far better than calling down fire from heaven. The ELCA needs to hear the traditional voice more than ever. From the voicing of the prayer, "Our Mother who is within us," to the printing of study bibles that included a footnote suggesting that Jesus did not really mean for us to make disciples, the ELCA has a contingent of people who do not know orthodox Christianity. Soft spoken but truthful speech is needed not just in ELCA, but in all of our religious debates.

Worms Germany

2010-10-24T20:51:00.000-04:00

Reformers Statues in Worms, Germany
Luther is in the center surrounded by other reformers such as Melanchthon, Hus, Wycliffe and others. This was an amazing trip. My wife and I spent ten days on a tour of Luther sites in Germany from September 15 to 25.

Three in the Morning!

2010-09-27T03:52:00.000-04:00

Sunday night I returned from a ten day tour of Germany and all the Luther sites. It is just past three in the morning and I am, obviously, still on Germany's time. Seeing the place where Luther posted the 95 theses made me aware of how courageous and bold he was. I pray for those who follow Jesus Christ to proclaim the gospel as boldly as did Luther. I will be posting pictures and other comments as soon as I can get my time clock readjusted.

Stephen Hawking

2010-09-04T19:22:00.000-04:00

Stephen Hawking's newest publication entitled, "The Grand Design," is scheduled to be released next week. The Wall Street Journal printed an excerpt on September 4th. In it Hawking contends that God did not create the universe. He writes, "As recent advances in cosmology suggest, the laws of gravity and quantum theory allow universes to appear spontaneously from nothing." This is an amazing statement. While I certainly yield to Mr. Hawking's mind, I find his assertion that universes appear spontaneously akin to a great magic act. If the universe has built into it this spontaneous appearance, I am wondering if I were to look out my backyard long enough would something magically appear! Faith and science need not fight one another, but can work together. God created out of nothing, but to suggest nothing created out of nothing, come on Mr. Hawking you can do better than that.

Septic Brains and Itching Ears

2010-08-31T18:14:00.000-04:00

It is said that necessity is the mother of invention. Being a creative person and loving the opportunity for a new way to do something, I see a great need for an ear-scratcher. What, you say is an ear-scratcher? It is a device similar to a back-scratcher. Most back-scratchers are sold in novelty stores. They are made from plastic or wood and have long handles enabling the user to scratch his or her back. An ear-scratcher, however, in order to be brought into the 21st century must be different. I suggest an electronic ear-scratcher. There is a great market for these devices since there are so many persons in the ELCA and modern day protestantism who are suffering with “itching ears.” The electronic ear-scratcher plays excerpts of 2 Timothy 4:3. Other audios portions could be recitations of Revelation 3:16. Perhaps repeated use and routine listening can suppress the itching illness so rampant among liberal theologians. The illness spreads faster than scabies and does far greater damage. Little children are led astray by false teachings under the guise that majority vote determines truth. Truth is found in the rich pages of scripture, but for those suffering with this dreaded ear disease they believe truth comes from within them and from their internal experience. The rest of us, or so they would say, are simply unenlightened. This hearing distortion leads to a secondary infection. It begins with itching ears and begins to affect the brain. Sadly, they are not even aware that the disease has passed the blood brain barrier and is seriously affecting their ability to think clearly. The brain becomes unable to see the plain and clear truth of scripture. Passages are distorted or in some cases cut out of the canon. They avoid calling God by His name. They suggest that Jesus did not really invite us to make disciples, but to COEXIST. They think Romans 1 and Matthew 19 are merely suggestions. The diagnosis is simple, but clear. They have septic brains. Ear-scratchers can help us bring healing and wholeness to those whose brains are poisoned by gnostic, narcissistic, and gospel reductionism. Are your ears itching? The Word of God cuts to the brain matter and can bring wholeness and healing. Read and hear God's Word.

It is Done!

2010-08-30T21:31:00.000-04:00

The NALC now exists as a viable option for confessional and biblical Lutherans. What is also done, at least one hopes, is the ELCA's obssession with sexual matters. But I doubt it. Next assembly will see a movement to use the word "bless" for unions as well as curriculum to be introduced in camps and Sunday School. I hope I am wrong and that the ELCA will have Bishops and others trying to pull us back to the center, but I doubt it. I hope the ELCA will begin to believe we are a church in mission called to make disciples, but I doubt it. I hope we will see the need to reconfigure how we make decisions, but I doubt it. I hope the next Churchwide will address the concerns of the four or so synods that rejected the social statement, but I doubt it. I doubt, and I am really do not want to say it, that the ELCA really wants traditionalist to stay, but I doubt it. Ok, I am a cynic!

Ambiguity Lives!

2010-08-22T17:39:00.000-04:00

Mixed feelings best describe most of us from South Carolina who will be attending the Theological Conference for All Lutherans being hosted in Columbus, Ohio this week. One of the speakers, Dr. Carl Braaten, wrote "Principles of Lutheran Theology." My copy, signed by Dr. Braaten, is worn out from reading and its regular use for reference. My angst centers on perceptions others hold about Braaten and other first class theologians who are aligning, is there any better way to say it, against the ELCA. What are pastors to do when the theologians we read and trust are no longer a part of the church to which we belong? Would Dr. Braaten be asked to be a bible study leader at a Synod of the ELCA? Churchwide?

Synods, seminaries and congregations are polarized. How will we find our way out of the malaise given the radically different approaches to the interpretation of scripture? Currently, I am an ELCA pastor under call and deeply thankful for the congregation that I serve. They and so many other congregational persons deserve better leadership from our national church than what we now have. How long will we continue to make theological decisions by vote? And if we continue determining doctrine by democracy without the influence of the theologians I read and trust, where does that leave me and the rest of us? Am I and my colleagues called to be a remnant in a church where bishops at the recent reception of PALMS celebrated Wiccan Goddesses? Who will call out these practices and teachings that are not a part of Christianity? Welcome to the first century.

Dr. Michael Root - A Man of Great Faith!

2010-08-14T19:53:00.003-04:00

Dr. Michael Root taught me theology during my seminary years from 1981 to 1985. For the last two years I have been privileged to be his pastor. It was a most humbling experience to have my theological mentor sitting in the pews. But it was even more gratifying to get to know this man of deep faith. Last week a mass was held for his conversion at St. Peter's Catholic Church. It was bitter sweet to be there. I felt a whole whirlwind of emotions from joy at seeing this historic event unfold to sadness that the ELCA has lost yet another great theologian.

Inappropriate Comments

2010-07-27T19:52:00.003-04:00

More and more wordless comments are getting posted and I am not sure how that is happening. So, all comments will be subjected to moderation. Sorry for the inconvenience, but it is a necessary protective measure to keep R rated material from appearing in comments.

All Are Welcome

2010-07-25T15:57:00.002-04:00

What if you arrived for Sunday worship to find a sign on the red double doors that said, “Nazi's Welcome.” What would you think? Since you know WWII history, you might be inclined to take the sign down or at the very least speak to your council or the pastor and ask if someone put up the sign or is it a prank. But what if I were to tell you that Nazi's are welcome in Christian churches. Would you agree or disagree? You would have to agree if you intend to be a follower of Jesus and adhere to the code of hospitality as outlined in Holy Scripture.
We would not place such a sign on our church door, however, for we do not wish to single out any particular group for a “special” welcome. I can just imagine a sign that reads, “Republicans Especially Welcome.” While I might be partial to such a sign, it too is deceptive and distorting to the nature of the Church. The only sign that should be allowed or permitted is, “All Are Welcome.” And this is as true today in all Christian churches as it has ever been. Every congregation that has Jesus Christ as its head opens its doors to everyone.
There is, however, an assumption that can never be made. A sign that says, “Nazi's Welcome ” does not imply that we welcome the attitudes and opinions that Nazi's hold. Just like a sign that might read, “Roman Catholics Welcome,” does not imply that in order to be especially welcoming to Roman Catholics Lutheran churches will adopt their belief system. Welcoming persons does not mean that we must change our creed to make them feel comfortable.
Imagine someone requesting to join your congregation who believes that Jesus was a mighty fine person, but not divine. While we might invite them to “hang out” with us and consider our belief that Jesus is the only son of God, would we invite them to serve on the church's governing board? I truly hope not. Scripture has clear directives for those who seek to lead the church. Read it for yourself in 1 Timothy 3 and especially verses 6 and 9.
As a Lutheran Christian, I adhere to the Lutheran Confessions and the Holy Scripture. These principles and teachings are not compromised in order to help someone feel more welcome. Read the gospel of John chapter 6:60-66. Verse 66 reads as follows, “From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.” It is not harsh or unwelcoming for people to count the cost of following Jesus and decide, this is not for me. One would hope, of course, that our love for each other is so contagious that it begins to infiltrate our congregations and transform our lives.
Lutheran doors are red for a reason. We enter this church through the blood of Jesus Christ. When you profess faith in Christ, you are submitting to his authority and agreeing to be obedient to him. So, when you walk through the red double doors you agree to explore with us what we believe and teach. Hospitality is always in order and we are to be warmly welcoming to all people all the time, but this does not trump our belief system. Purity of doctrine is always more important than unity at the cost of a watered down, believe whatever you wish theology.
So, nothing has changed in Lutheran churches. All persons are welcome, but not all belief systems. We are a Christian church committed to making disciples. When Paul wrote to the Corinthians, a church embroiled with much division, he reminded them that the most excellent way was love. Let us love one another and welcome all people with the love of Christ.

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the law..."

2010-06-25T20:06:00.003-04:00

Clearly, Jesus intends the Old Testament law to be applicable to Christians. Bonhoeffer wrote, "The disciples are bound to the Old Testament Law. In doing so, Jesus says two things to his disciples: allegiance to the law by itself is not yet discipleship; nor may allegiance to this person of Jesus Christ without the law be called discipleship." This, I believe, is what Lutheran Christians can refer to as the third use of the law. It is challenging to read all the laws of the Levitical law code and make proper distinctions about what are applicable and what are not. It is troubling, however, to see attempts by some interpreters to dismiss certain texts so easily. The danger is we adopt a New Testament faith that is empty of the guidance of the law. This is referred to in Christian history as Marcionism. The Barna research group discovered in a 2002 survey that more and more Christians in the United States are practicing syncretism, a blending of religious ideas. Ignorance of these past heresies leads to an incremental adoption of them.

"God's Word is leading us to this..."

2010-06-07T10:32:00.002-04:00

These words were spoken in the midst of debate at the South Carolina 2010 Synod assembly. It is dangerous for me to guess just exactly what "this" means, but I can tell you the context was human sexuality and particularly same gender sexual relationships. If, however, what was intended is that God's Word is fully supportive of the ministry changes, then why does the social statement, "Human Sexuality Gift and Trust," state under option three and four, "On the basis of conscience-bound belief, some are convinced that the scriptural witness does not address the context of sexual orientation and lifelong loving and committed relationships that we experience today." Now reflect on that statement for one moment. Why spend pages upon pages and why trot out scholar upon scholar with PhD's and enlightened (a slightly veiled reference to Gnosticism-well maybe not so veiled) knowledge about Holy Scripture when the social statement says clearly, "the scriptural witness does not address the context of sexual orientation..." We would be better served by a statement made by Dr. Walter Wink, who at least one has to admit was bold enough to say that the scriptural witness got it wrong about same sex sexual relationships. Which is it? Is God's Word leading us to this acceptance or convicting us of our sin? God's Word cannot lead us if God's Word does not address the context of - you know the rest. So, here is the problem. The Church saw a problem or a need, if you will, regarding same gender sexual relationships and instead of offering a statement of pastoral care and urging all persons to be treated with dignity, the national Church engaged in a pseudo bible study, tried to muster momentum, enlisted the support of a major special interest group, listened to all voices and ultimately neglected to listen to the one clear voice and teaching for the past 2000 years. Then, offered a teaching document filled with inconsistency and flaws. Again, note the difference, this is a teaching document. The South Carolina Assembly approved a resolution offered by the Orthodox Lutherans of South Carolina to reconsider the Social Statement. Let us go back to the adoption of the Bishop's statement of pastoral concern issued in 1993.

Rescind Ministry Policies Passes

2010-06-05T20:50:00.002-04:00

The Orthodox Lutherans of South Carolina report that our resolution, Memorial To Rescind Actions on Ministry Policies, passed the SOuth Carolina Synod Assembly on June 5, 2010 by a vote of 209 yes to 192 no. Before we become jubilant, and that would not be wise anyway, this memorial resolves to "1) rescind the actions CA09.05.26 and CA09.05.27 of the 2009 Churchwide Assembly and 2) to direct the appropriate churchwide units and offices to prepare, the Committee on Appeals to make, and the ELCA Church Council to approve and adopt, appropriate amendments to the policy documents, which were revised in response to thos prior actions, in order to reestablish the prohibition of rostered service by non-celibate homosexual persons and to restore the requirement for rostered persons that sexual intimacy take place only in the context of heterosexual marriage." We, the Orthodox Lutherans of South Carolina are thankful for the fervent prayers of many and the hard work of our steering committee. This resolution sends a powerful signal to Churchwide. Granted the vote was not overwhelming, but it did pass and it was taken tonight after all the others were considered. People were tired, but spoke clearly. Overall, the tone of conversations were kind. I am thankful for our Synod's leadership and thankful that this resolution passed even though I know that the Churchwide will probably not get to it in 2011! It is our humble prayer that all the people who voted for the changes understand that we who oppose the change are not going away, but will persist in reversing a grave error in teaching that is destroying our unity and mission.

SC SYNOD DAY ONE

2010-06-04T23:00:00.002-04:00

Today the South Carolina Assembly of the ELCA voted by a margin of approximately two to one a resolution affirming marriage. The resolution was posted at www.sclutheran.com and I believe it can be found at www.reformfromwithin.com But, sadly, the resolution asked for the candidacy committee to discourage PALMS from seeking a call in the South Carolina synod was defeated. This resolution we felt would give the orthodox in the Synod a place to stand. Tomorrow will be a new day.

I'm Back

2010-05-29T16:28:00.005-04:00

Sorry, I have been away for some time mostly due to my schedule, but also due to a spiritual wrangling about what to do in the midst of the confessional crisis in the ELCA. I am an ELCA pastor that loves the congregation that I am called to serve and in my prayers God tells me to be patient and wait. I am not sure what I am waiting for, but know with certainty that I am called to pastor the congregation that I currently serve. In one week we will convene as a synod in Newberry, SC. The Orthodox Lutherans of South Carolina have written six resolutions. These are available for download and review at www.sclutheran.org Many will contend that we are resisting valid change, but in reality there is more at stake than interpretations regarding sexuality. What is at stake is the authority of Holy Scripture. We will resist the changes and even attempt to reverse those changes.

Sinking Ship?

2010-03-19T15:59:00.003-04:00

Dr. Hinlicky has some strong words for the ELCA. Read his words only if you have a strong heart!

http://www.lutheranforum.org/sexuality/in-statu-embarassmentionis/

Lutheran Partners Letter

2010-03-18T11:51:00.002-04:00

Please check out the link below that will take you to a letter written to the editor of the Lutheran Partners magazine. Look for the March/April 2010 magazine and a letter by James A. Cates of Northeastern Indiana. His letter deserves a very wide reading as it illustrates well the deep divide between many of us, while at the same time holds out hope. The link is www.elca.org/lutheranpartners or as I copied and pasted the one below.

http://www.elca.org/Growing-In-Faith/Vocation/Lutheran-Partners.aspx

Moderation

2010-03-13T19:30:00.001-05:00

Sorry, I inadvertantly checked moderate. This means I was to moderate every comment before it was posted. I did not intend to do that.

The Earth is the Lord's

2010-03-13T16:39:00.003-05:00

The Earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof... What an amazing creation God made. Today a small group walked 4.4 miles at Congaree Swamp. We saw a beaver, a summer tanger (a bird I never heard of), a rabbit, and last but certainly not least a large cottonmouth snake - a.k.a. a water mocassin. The creatures were quite active and it was a great pleasure to be in the swamp. One of our group nearly stepped on the snake giving us all a scare. I attempted to force the cottonmouth away from the trail using my walking stick only to jump back when the snake rapidly turned my way. I did not hesitate to leave it alone. We all had a heightened sense of awareness for the rest of the trip. For none of us wished to tangle with a potentially deadly poisonous snake. The presence of poision in the midst of such beauty should not surprise anyone as it is an analogy for the Church. Our Lutheran confessions state that the devil holds office in the church. Sin is pervasive and our structures are not immune to the cunning assaults of the evil one. More than a few have shared with me their didain for politics in the church and the backbiting and rumors that all too often poison a potentially sweet fellowship of Christians. We should not be so naive to think that we can live in a heavenly realm while our bodies still carry the virus of original sin. No church is safe from gossip and hurt, but we are all called to have a deep awareness that evil lurks at every corner, even in our own thoughts and actions. Be alert and on guard as you never know what poison is near.

Changes Made

2010-03-06T18:37:00.003-05:00

Anonymous posting is no longer available on this blog. While I allowed this to facilitate open discussion, there is too much confusion. Also, if you wish to vent on this blog, then you are going to have to identify yourself. And, if some of the posts continue using terms like the most recent which used the inflammatory word "hypocritical" with no basis in fact, I will consider deleting the post. I do not have to read garbage and neither should any of the readers to this blog. If you have something to say, say it, but say it with some modicum of manners. Passion is fine, but attacks will not be tolerated. I have this wonderful button called delete and will start using it. Frankly, I am growing weary of illogical and ridiculous content without any appeal to scripture. Since this is a blog dedicated to the Scripture, make an appeal using Holy Scripture.

2010-03-03T15:09:00.002-05:00

The life of the disciples is on my mind. This is due, in part, to our preparation for the Living Last Supper drama presentation. Of note is the Apostle John. John was committed to truth. He used the word – truth – in his writings. He used the word 25 times in his gospel and twenty more times in his epistles. He records Jesus words in John 14:6, "I am the way, the truth and the life." The truth by which we live our lives is unchangeable, but truth without grace can become sharp and cutting. John tells Jesus in Mark chapter 9:38, "Teacher, we saw a man casting out demons in your name, and we forbade him, because he was not following us." There is a reason John and his brother James are referred to in Holy Scripture as the "sons of thunder." John is passionate about truth, but perhaps so much so that he misses the balance. Truth is inextricably bound to grace. The truth of scripture should convict us and make us squirm with our sinfulness. But the scripture also conveys grace. Dr. Yeago communicates this theologically by saying, "What the law demands, the gospel bestows." We cannot change truth to suit our feelings nor to make us feel better. While at the same time, we cannot use truth as an object to beat any and all unmercifully. Another theologian, Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote, "Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance…" Grace without truth becomes cheapened. We can never fully know the depths of Christ sacrifice on the cross and experience God's amazing grace, truly know it in our souls, until we face the truth of our sinfulness.

Bishop Mauney's Letter

2010-02-10T22:47:00.001-05:00

New message dated August 31, 2009

I greet you in the Name that is above every Name, our Lord Jesus Christ, crucified and risen, who fills the height, depth, length, and breadth of all things, including your lives, this synod, and His whole Church. May we be made strong in the strength that comes from his glorious power, while being prepared to endure everything with patience, while joyfully giving thanks to the Father, who has enabled us to share in the inheritance of the saints in the light as we care for the mission of this church across this nation and around the world.

In the midst of our full communion with the United Methodist Church, I offer John Wesley’s Rule,

“Do all the good you can,

By all the means you can,

In all the ways you can,

In all the places you can,

At all the times you can,

To all the people you can,

As long as ever you can.”

Galatians 6: “So whenever we have the opportunity, let us work for the good of all, and especially for the family of Christ.”

May we keep our focus on Christ even in the midst of our discussions.

As your bishop, I would like to define for you where I personally am as we continue together to converse with one another who are in a variety of understandings.

Having shared where I am, it allows me, then, to be ever more attentive to your sharing with me and my listening with you.

The approved social statement on Human Sexuality provides a way of understanding relationships through the lens of ‘trust.’ I am grateful in all the ways it speaks to being chaste before marriage, to all the ways it speaks for the care and welfare of children and families, to the ways it challenges our culture and society in the ways that we demean and exploit others in matters of sex.

Where I would ask for greater clarity was in the sections on marriage and family. I believe the Task Force was seeking to speak to the centeredness of marriage and family throughout the Church’s centuries, but it lacked the bold word for it.

The statement says, “Social trust undergirds healthy societies.” I believe marriage between husband and wife who raise children in a healthy way is what undergirds healthy societies, one generation upon another. This is the normative tradition that has come to us through the centuries and continues to be the gold standard for societal stability.

The scriptures’ and Martin Luther norm marriage and raising children in the faith as what produces strong families, one generation built upon another. This family structure undergirds healthy societies. A part of our catechism is our teaching to youth and young adults this life long commitment blessed by God where the very mystery of the otherness of God is found in the other. The additional blessing that is possible within marriage is then to bear children and to raise them in the faith and love of God [4th Commandment, Large Catechism]. It is to be taught, then, to children and grandchildren and greatgrandchildren. This care of parents to pass on the faith and its life is what St. Paul speaks to II Timothy 1:13-14: “Guard the good treasure entrusted to you, with the help of the Holy Spirit living in us.” Remaining chaste until one finds such a partner for a life long marriage that may lead to children and raising a new generation in the faith is at the center and normative for our understanding of this tradition handed down to us.

I heard the commissioner of the dept of social services of our commonwealth say that after 30 years of working in social services he had come to the conclusion that a family with both father and mother is the very spine of our society today.

I would speak for this kind of clarity in the social statement’s sections on marriage and family and children, and this is what I believe is what should be lifted up as the normative tradition among us.

I would like us to speak forthrightly about this marriage between man and woman and this gift of both mother and father as bishops within the home that are the foundation of our church and society.

This is the strong, mighty tree that sustains healthy generations and family trees.

Then as we acknowledge that all of us struggle not as we ought but as we are able, we might speak to how we then provide welcome and shelter in the branches of this foundation for all of us who struggle within our relationships.

At the end of my words, I have added my pertinent words on my views about homosexuality and life within the church, written before the synod assembly. It was sent to all the rostered leaders, but some did not share it with the membership. I think it is important to read what I have written so that you know where I am coming from as we enter into the days ahead.

I do give great thanks to God for you and your love in the Lord and serving in His Name!!

Now I want to try and be clear about some things:

1 I am a ELCA Lutheran bishop, and I do not lead this synod by myself. We are blessed as a synod with wonderfully wise synodical officers and a very strong Synod Council composed of talented lay leaders and pastors from across our commonwealth. We will be meeting September 8-10 to talk and lead together. Just as congregational councils and pastors should pray and speak and decide together, it is the same with the Synod Council and the bishop.

2 We have 163 congregations and a ministerium of over 250 rostered leaders. Both are composed of very, very faithful people. It is a time of listening to one another. The deans of our conferences met together yesterday and shared with one another as the Leadership Support Committee and Synod Staff listened. I am seeking to be available by phone, email, letters, and visits as well in the weeks and months to come. Our Gathering of the Ministerium in early October will also allow a time for gathered conversation among our rostered leadership.

3 The Virginia Synod has come out of ULCA and LCA tradition where the synod has seen itself as a vibrant partner within the whole church. The Virginia Synod has looked to the decisions of its churchwide assemblies as giving wisdom through social statements, directions, and policies for the whole church. In these past eighteen years of these discussions, the Virginia Synod was not the testing ground for the blessing of same sex unions or the ordination of rostered leaders in same sex unions because of the churchmanship of our rostered leaders who looked to the churchwide assembly to give direction, as it should. I want to express my deep appreciation to all of those rostered leaders and congregations that remained strongly a part of the synod even while being greatly disturbed at the church’s non-movement in these matters. They now look to their partners within the synod as these decisions by the churchwide assembly come into effect to remain steadfastly among us.

4 This past June, our Virginia Synod Assembly took a number of sense motions on these issues that the churchwide assembly approved. Our votes as a synod were in the ranges of from 220-170 to 210 to 180 on these matters. Individuals within congregations that see their congregations as 100% for or against, may discover their congregations to be closer to 55%/45%.

5 We will not be implementing these decisions made at the churchwide assembly right away. For a large church of over 4.5 million, the policy steps will be many before they are actually implemented. I will keep you updated on that progress, and we will wait together for their completion.

6 I ask you to notice carefully the wording of the resolutions.

1. That the ELCA commit itself to finding ways to allow congregations that choose to do so to recognize, support and hold publicly accountable life-long, monogamous, same-gender relationships. It does not say ‘pastors’ that choose to do so or ‘synods’ that choose to do so, but ‘congregations’ that choose to do so. That was intentional. The congregation itself is the one that chooses what it chooses to do. This social statement has no power in itself to force a congregation to have to make any decision at all, even to consider it at all. It does provide a beginning place for congregations that choose to do so. Its intent is that congregational councils and rostered leaders decide together, and then, from those decisions for congregations to decide.

2. That the ELCA commit itself to finding a way for people in such publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationships to serve as rostered leaders of this church. The first step is defining as a church what is a publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship. The second step is to recognize that a congregation in the Virginia Synod does not receive only one name in a call process, but as many healthy candidates as are available for a call committee. It has always been the two thirds decision of a call committee to recommend a candidate, the two thirds vote of a council to recommend, and a two thirds secret ballot of a congregation to call anyone to serve as a rostered leader of a congregation. Nothing has changed in this calling procedure.

3.This resolution called upon members to respect the bound consciences of those with whom they disagree; declared the intent to allow structured flexibility in decision-making about candidacy and the call process; eliminated the prohibition of rostered service by members in publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous same-gender relationships; recognized and committed to respect the conviction of members who believe that the ELCA should not call or roster people in committed same-gender relationships; called for development of accountability guidelines; directed that appropriate amendments to ministry policy documents be drafted and approved by the Church Council; and urged that this church continue to trust congregations, bishops, synods and others responsible for determining who should be called into public ministry. This resolution attempts to recognize the variety of settings and cultures and understandings within the ELCA. It seeks to acknowledge and respect those who believe we should not call or roster people in committed same-gender relationships.

4 My favorite church historian, Dr. David Delaney said, “Even if we are a church in error---that is far better than being a church in schism.” Teaching and admonishment, wisdom and insight can happen through the flow of the life of the church far better while still together than in separation from one another. Besides that, I am a Bishop who is often in error!

I give thanks for you all and the ongoing mission of the church together, 180 years as a synod, this year! Even as I have tried to send this note to you all, I have prayed with three folks by phone in different matters, spoken concerning the ministry of Lutheran Family Services, helped a congregation in a call process, starting preparing a sermon for an ordination this Sunday, joined in conversation with four new freshmen at Roanoke College, set up time to meet the new intern at Brandon Oaks and Christ Lutheran, celebrated our moving our synod archives to the library at Roanoke College, to name but a few joys of this life together in Christ.

I give thanks for the thousands of prayers, words, and deeds done by you all for the glory of Christ in this gift of a day!

Bishop Mauney

Here are the words I shared in late May that still reflect my thinking:

“I recognize that many who are gay are not so by simply choice. We do not fully understand why we are sexually oriented the way we are, whether genetic, environmental, sociological, relational, but it seems to begin very early for just about all of us. I continue in conversation with sociologists, doctors, theologians, reading and listening, but I do not yet hear a clear foundational grounding that is Copernican in scientific proof or sociologically certain. I have not, like Peter in Acts, seen the holy vision as from only God regarding a new way of seeing. But I am becoming far more aware of the vulnerability of our gay members within our institutional church and our national culture, and I am hearing from more families who now wrestle with this within their homes.

But like all of us, I remain seeking to guard the good treasure entrusted to me.

Now it feels to me that many of us are growing in our heart for those among us who are gay, even as we remain steadfast in our understanding of scriptures and tradition. Remaining connected with those who are gay and remaining connected with the tradition and whole Church is what a colleague bishop of mine describes as the tender crossing of our heart and mind in the midst of our rescued soul. I am compelled baptismally to be grounded and rooted in the love of Christ learned through scripture, tradition, in relationship with the whole Church through the generations and around the world. I am compelled baptismally to be grounded and rooted in the love of Christ to have regard for all my baptized sisters and brothers within this Church including those who are gay.

I begin with what norms me in this matter and then move to my pastoral concern and struggle for those within our own church who are baptized and very active in the church.

Marriage and Family are normed by scripture and our Lutheran Confessions:

1 The Holy Scripture and our Lutheran Confessions norm male/female Marriage as the intention of God from Genesis to Revelation, from Small Catechism to Large Catechism. Marriage and family is normed from such a relationship. This is our grounding, our starting point, our foundation of what we believe God intends. This is the foundational strength to our generations within the life of the church and society.

2 The first story of creation grows in anticipation of male and female made in the image of God for the first blessing of scripture, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.” It is re-echoed in the Word of creation made flesh, “But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.’”

3 The heart of the second story of creation is the intimate relationship between God and humans, between husband and wife, between gardener and the garden, and the relationships gone awry through disobedience. The oneness of flesh is spoken in terms of a rib taken from the side, under the arm of the man. This relationship between Adam and Eve leads to the birth of children.

4 The writer of Ephesians uses the norm of husband and wife to express the love of Jesus Christ for the Church. The writer uses the norm of Jesus Christ’s love for the Church to define the love of husband for his wife. “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, in order to make her holy by cleansing her with the washing of water by the word, so as to present the church to himself in splendor, without a spot or wrinkle or anything of the kind—yes, so that she may be holy and without blemish.” The word for ‘present’ comes from a Greek verb meaning, ‘to stand beside.’ I believe the writer of Ephesians gets this wording from the writer of Colossians who describes the justifying, grace-filled love of Christ in these words, “And you who were estranged and hostile in mind, doing evil deeds, he has now reconciled in his fleshly body through death, so as to present you holy and blameless and irreproachable before him—provided that you continue securely established and steadfast in the faith, without shifting from the hope promised by the gospel that you heard.” The Greek verb for ‘present’ in Colossians means ‘to stand beside.’ The mystery of Christ’s deep love for his Church is presented in the metaphor of husband and wife. The description of marriage’s deep love is presented in the mystery of Christ’s love for the Church. For me, they describe one joined to the hip-or rib.

5 The writer of Revelations begins his conclusion with the vision of the New Jerusalem as the bride adorned for her husband.

6 The scriptures and Lutheran Confessions do not approve or affirm same sex behavior at all. I do not see a single instance or even inference of approval or affirmation within them. While the argument of silence or the long, intricate arguments in Greek and social criticism seek to discount the texts within scripture that speak against same sex behavior, I see no support for same sex behavior within any of our norming documents in chapter 2 of our constitution.

7 The scriptures and Lutheran Confessions of our church order marriage, family, and society as normed by husband and wife who love and raise children in the faith. Parents are called to be bishops of their home for their children, to raise them in the faith as their highest calling.

8 This norm stands like a mustard seed becoming a strong tree for our Christian lives and society. It stands like a mighty tree of life in the midst of God’s garden.

9 Currently, the estate of Marriage is the only partnered relationship recognized by the ELCA for rostered leaders. I sense that in the vast majority of congregations and people in our pews throughout the ELCA, this understanding of marriage remains the only relationship recognized for members.

10 The Word of Creation that spoke order from chaos and blessed the relationship of male and female in his image, is the Word made flesh, the physician who has come for the weak, the Lord who has come to rescue us from sin, evil, and death….all of us.

AND AMONG US, WITHIN OUR CONGREGATIONS AND FAMILIES

1 I recognize that we have gay sisters and brothers that we love within the church, baptized, who are in Christ, who have the Holy Spirit so within them that they cry ‘Abba Father’, ‘Come Lord Jesus’, who believe that Christ is true to His baptismal promise that they belong to Him and that Christ does not lie.

2 Recommendation One has to do with recognizing our very own faithful members, many who were raised within our congregations. Many are our very own children, raised in the church from infancy, who remain active in the church. They are not worshipping other gods; they are baptized children of God asking the church to support their desire for a lifelong relationship with one person. They come asking for a recognition aware of Leviticus 18 and 20, aware of Romans 1, but aware of “Return to the Lord your God, for He is gracious and merciful, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love.” They know the proscriptions, but right along with every one of us they cling to a greater promise, ‘he who believes and is baptized shall be saved.’

3 The Lutheran Church has tacitly recognized the presence of a gay orientation for decades. We have had some celibate gay pastors actively serving in the life of the church. We have recognized the presence of ‘couples’ within the life of the congregation who have been strong members of our congregations. We silently recognized the reality of their presence.

4 I Corinthians 6 and Article 23 & 27 of the Augsburg Confession, both scripture and Lutheran Confessions, speak to the ‘gift’ of celibacy and speak to the need for an ordered relationship for those who ‘burn’ so that there will not be greater sin. They testify that not everyone will be able in this life to live celibately OR to alter their orientation. This is also part of the reality that we need to recognize.

5 I recognize, as well, that many in our church HAVE persevered in a life of chaste celibacy. I commend all who remain chaste and celibate. We give thanks for their model of the godly life. As a church we should celebrate and pray for single and chaste sisters and brothers who may live a life of great service in this church and in the world.

6 Our grace-based ability to recognize reality and call a thing what it really is, allows us to make the following distinction: for all of us, to be in a promiscuous life-style is dangerous, deadly, and far from the intent of God. To be in a life-long monogamous relationship is safer and far closer to the intent of God.

7 Promiscuity leads to greater sin; monogamous life-long intent provides for more ordered relationships.

8 But some will certainly object that scripture simply calls homosexual behavior sin and demands that it be abandoned as the condition of repentance and acceptance in the church.

Pastorally, I could in instances, use the Hebrew word for Sin as ‘Missing the Mark’

While many speak to sin as a wrong deed and repentance as the simple abandoning of wrong, Luther spoke to sin as a condition, a power from which he sought to be rescued. Our desire to live lives of purity and freedom from wrongdoing may be far more a reality of recognizing our being in a circumstance of sin from which we cannot entirely escape until death, but yet our ongoing desire is to live as faithfully as we can ever asking for forgiveness in this life of our bondage to sin.

1 The Hebrew language uses several words for ‘sin’. One of the most used words for sin is ‘missing the mark.’

2 To miss the mark can mean to shoot at a very small stick and miss it completely.

3 To ‘miss the mark’ can mean to miss the bulls eye but can still be recognized as on the field of the target, perhaps as good an attempt as possible by the one making the effort.

4 To miss the mark can be recognized as the lesser of evils.

5 To miss the mark can be recognized as the best one can do given the circumstances.

6 To miss the mark can be prayed, “we give thanks to you, O Lord, not as we ought but as we are able.” [Eucharistic Prayer] To miss the mark describes the lives of every one of us.

7 The sacraments are signs of all that misses the mark being invited and gathered in the one who is the bulls eye, Jesus Christ, the Alpha and Omega.

8 The gospels describe the love of Jesus acting in love again and again for one person after another who missed the mark, till he was crucified himself as one who missed the mark by the righteous ones who believed they were in the bulls eye.

9 I would say that same sex unions ‘miss the mark’ of the norm of marriage.

10 I would say divorce misses the mark. Recognizing a divorce may allow the lesser of evils to be done given the circumstances, perhaps even to be doing the best one can given the circumstances.

11 Recognizing a publicly accountable life long monogamous same sex union may allow the best one can do given the circumstances.

12 In every congregation I know of, we presently recognize the reality of divorce. The recognizing of divorce that affects nearly 50% of our people is much easier for us to recognize and include within the life of the church than the recognition of a circumstance that affects 3% of our people. Not recognizing 3%, whose circumstance seems very different from the norm, is easier than not recognizing circumstances that have affected 50% of marriages among us. We don’t bless divorce; we recognize the reality of a divorce, and we should not remarry the divorced to another except through individual pastoral counseling, including a recognition of what was the sinful failure of a previous marriage. It is a matter of pastoral care and individual circumstance of our members seeking to live as faithfully as they can ever asking for forgiveness in this life of our bondage to sin.

Now it seems to me that:

1 The love of Christ did not and does not bless our circumstances; the love of Christ recognizes the reality of our circumstances and came to rescue us from real powers of sin, evil, and death from which we cannot escape on our own, by our choice. The love of Christ acts on our behalf to make us His own. Romans 5 speaks to while we were sinful, weak, enemies, he proved his love in acting on our behalf.

2 The altar rail for receiving Holy Communion is the gathering of those who constantly miss the mark invited by the Christ who actively recognized and took upon himself our sin so that he might be in communion, truly present with us, forgiving our sin and us in his life. The Happy Exchange that Luther speaks to is not an attitude but divine love actively taking on the circumstances of the other, taking on the life of the other.

3 Some of our members who are parents in this church have recognized and welcomed their children and their same sex partnerships into their homes because their active love would rather have them home in a relationship with them than apart from them. They have not blessed the relationship, they have recognized the circumstances and their love has welcomed home and embraced those they love.

4The divine love of God for His children is even greater than the love of human parents for their children. It is slower to anger and even more abounding in steadfast love, for God knows our circumstances far better than we.

5 Recognition is not the same as blessing. Recognition can mean to accept the reality of.

6 Because marriage is regarded and lifted up and taught as the norm in our teaching, as the strength of the order that establishes the foundation for family life, then instances of pastoral care might be used for the recognition of a publicly accountable life long monogamous same sex relationship. Such a decision provides a more communal way to recognize same sex couples among us and support them. I say that to tacitly ‘know’ of them while not providing them recognition and a community that will act on their behalf while proclaiming a Christ who boldly acted on our sinful behalf to rescue us could also be seen as missing the mark. It could be seen as our passing them by in silence on the road as a Levite or priest headed to Jericho, these very ones who need, rather, a community to bind them up and accompany them. If we have been silently recognizing their presence among us while not allowing them to know of our recognition, let us allow them the opportunity for a public recognition that will help them with a pastoral and community witness to persevere in their relationship. Gay persons have shared with me that a public recognition would help them in upholding their commitment to the relationship. While we as ELCA members across this church may differ in our ability to value the recognition of such a relationship, we could value its life long monogamy as far better, safer, and kinder than life long promiscuity or a life long wondering of whether or not they are truly cherished as a member within the community of the crucified Christ.

7 I say this church ought to continue to teach marriage as the norm and intent of God for creation. The Estate of Marriage of a man and woman norms a strong tree of life for the church and society, for the raising of children in faith, and I say that this particular tree, created and ordained by God is able to sustain also the instances of birds who make their nests in its branches, even up to 3%. The strength of the norm can hold within its branches that which may need shelter within its branches. With marriage remaining as what norms our understanding of family, we may be able to contain within the life of the church those instances for our baptized, active members where a monogamous life long relationship is being asked to be recognized, supported, and held publicly accountable within the strength of the Christian community. So I do not bless, but I do recognize the reality of brothers and sisters in the faith who may desire to be in a life long monogamous same sex relationship.

8 What may be far more threatening to the strength of the tree is a divorce rate of 50% of marriages within the church. This is the very time we should consider how ineffective our ministry of marriage has been in a church that experiences a 50% divorce rate, and work hard on our recovery of our theology of marriage and family with a renewal of ministry in this area.

In my teaching of confirmation, I would not change in my teaching of the commandments. But, if asked, I would speak to what has been and is the norm of this church, marriage. I would speak to the orders of creation. Then I would speak to how we as the church recognize special circumstances beyond the norm such as divorce and same sex relationships that call for pastoral care and individual counseling that can lead to a pastoral care response that can also call upon the congregation to support. I would speak to those who find themselves beyond the vows of marriage seeking to live now as faithfully as they can with the congregation around them.”

The Rev. James F. Mauney

Bishop

God created all life?

2010-02-08T22:57:00.003-05:00

"To not believe that two people of the same sex can be in love is in my mind a heresy. God created all of life." I thought this quote from Anonymous was worth exploring logically. I agree with this quotation. A father can love his son. A grandfather can love his grandson. Plenty of individuals express love to one another. I suppose, however, you mean in love and love expressed sexually. Can a mother and daughter express their love sexually to one another? Is that not off limits? If so, then what are your reasons? Where do you get guidance for this boundary on sexual expression? Secondly, God created all life which includes animals. I dare not go down the line of reasoning where that could go. Where does our reason and the guidance of scripture intersect? Why monogamy? Why not polygamy? King Solomon had 700 wives. If, as I contend, we use scripture to interpret scripture, then we understand that the words of Jesus in Matthew 19 point us back to Genesis. But then, I am certain that I am speaking Greek and you - Anonymous are speaking French. No insult intended to the French.

The Speech I wanted to make at Holy Conversation Day - It was Too Long!

2010-02-08T10:51:00.002-05:00

Dear Friends, I come before you with joy, but also a great sense of humility. For today we gather in Holy Conversation as a church. We come to this place, Newberry College, the place that educated my daughter in a most excellent way. It is in this place that I came as a youth to Newberry College Day. It is this Synod that has nurtured my family and my ancestors since John Meetze set foot on this land in the early 1700's. I am connected to all of you and we are all family. God created us to be in relationship with one another. In the beginning of time, God created us in his image. God created us male and female so that together we might be form families, be in companionship, and give glory to God in our relationships. The churches mission is now and has been since its inception to teach in accordance with the Holy Scripture.

We read Holy Scripture through the enlightenment and guidance of the Holy Spirit. The church teaches in accord with scripture and cannot teach outside of it. Granted we are given the ability to discern and interpret that word, but there are core beliefs which are central to our life together. Principles which are handed down from generation to generation and are part of our Grand Tradition of teaching. One such teaching is God's intent for creation. That intent is for one man and one woman to join together in marriage. Genesis 2:24 "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh." This is God's intent for creation. This is God's ideal. This ideal is affirmed by Jesus in Matthew 19:4-6 when he says, "Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,'^[^a]
⁵and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'^[^b]? ⁶So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate." And, I add, this is the interpretation of all those who have come before us. Scripture teaches that there is only one place for the expression of sexual intimacy. Everywhere in scripture this ideal is lifted up.

The thread of male and female relationships is woven throughout the entire context of scripture. For instance, consider the book of Song of Solomon, "I liken you, my darling, to a mare harnessed to one of the chariots of Pharaoh. Your cheeks are beautiful with earrings, your neck with strings of jewels. We will make you earrings of gold, studded with silver." This entire book celebrates romantic love between a man and a woman. The entire book is devoted to the love between a man and a woman. Consider also the prophetic words of Hosea. He is a prophet called by God and instructed to take a wife as a symbol of God's relationship with His people. Consider the words of Jesus in Matthew 9:15, Jesus answered, "How can the guests of the bridegroom mourn while he is with them? The time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them; then they will fast." Consider the words of the book of Revelation in chapter 21:1-2, "Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. ²I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband."

I am not so naïve to think that there are relationships other than marriage. I know of some that are faithful and one could even say monogamous, but the culture does not dictate teaching. The church has a mission to teach in accordance with scripture and clearly there is no other relationship lifted up in a positive manner outside of the marriage of one man and one woman. Of course, some will cite the change of our culture and our need as the church to address these changes and adapt accordingly. Again, it is important to note that we might recognize and even give some validity to certain cultural changes, but the church can only teach in accordance with Holy Scripture. Our teaching must remain pure and above reproach.

Some of you will mention the ordination of women. You may cite the Corinthian prohibition of women keeping silent in the church or even the instruction in Timothy that no woman can have authority over a man. But to cite these passages is to miss the entire context of scripture. These two passages cannot be considered universal rules. Debra was a judge over Israel and no doubt had authority and spoke on the job – do you not think! Consider Paul's address to the Romans in chapter 16 and the one he mentions as an apostle, one named Junia. Some modern scholarship suggests this was a woman given the title of apostle. But even more dramatic consider that God is intentional in all that He does, so intentional, in fact, that God allowed women to be the first witnesses to the resurrection and the first ones to proclaim Jesus is risen. Scripture dictates our teaching concerning women.

Still others cite the Levitical law codes as if we are to summarily dismiss them out of hand. I have read all of Leviticus and I am fully aware that there are practices that are no longer deemed fit for us. Read my post on mildew. It is interesting to note, however, that the law codes of Leviticus forbid incest and bestiality as well. Obviously, those are not lifted up as viable sexual orientations. Suppose someone in our churches came forward and said, "I was born with an attraction to multiple partners." Is that also not forbidden? On what grounds or logic is polyamorous relationships forbidden? Is it proper for us to take the concept of monogamy and then apply that to other sexual relationships?

Consider the often used distraction of citing the acceptance of slavery in our culture for so long. Some have even argued that we could interpret the scripture, a culturally bound document they would say, suggesting that scripture supports slavery. Clearly, Paul argues in Philemon for the kind treatment of the slave Onesimus and even argues for his release. Even more dramatically is the entire narrative of the Exodus in which God calls Moses to set his people free from slavery.

No, in every instance when slavery or the ordination of women has been cited as reasons to now open up ordination for practicing homosexuals, the church misread Holy Scripture. We are not misreading it in regard to homosexual unions. Scripture never mentions these relationships in a positive manner. There is not a shred of evidence. There is not one verse to which one can point. There is not one principle of the Grand Tradition of teaching to which one can find a sexual revisionist conclusion. It is simply not there.

Pointedly, Bishop Hanson and other revisionist have said openly and clearly that the writers of Holy Scripture did not know sexual orientation as we do today. This I contend is false, but even if true would suggest that we make a decision about what we will teach in our churches based on our knowledge and our reason. That is not the mission of the church. We can only teach in accordance with the Holy Scripture.

Please note the church is always a place of welcome, no matter what. We do not close our doors to anyone because all need to hear the Word of God and be fed and nurtured by the holy bread and wine. But we teach and believe in accordance with the Holy Scripture because we have a Holy God who has the power to transform our lives not bless them as they are. Shall we be the church that welcomes all, but also holds up the pure standards of Holy Scripture? Or shall we be the culturally accommodating church that moves with all the wishes and whims of culture? I know where I wish for us to be and I urge the same for all of you. May God bless us all.

Initial and Brief Reflections

2010-02-07T19:57:00.002-05:00

I was a skeptic about Holy Conversation Day, but people were civil and a lot of dialogue took place. Dr. Yeago presented a deeply theological reflection while Dr. McCarver presented a more historical approach colored by the biblical reflections of Dr. Peterson. Apparently, there is a lot of positive buzz on Dr. McCarver's remarks and while it was well done from a debate point of view, it made false comparisons such as women's ordination and slavery. While I am a big fan of her great historical knowledge and ability to present it, I am not a fan of her presentation yesterday. She might as well have waved the American flag and spoke of how she loved baseball and apple pie, but then again that was not what we were there to hear. Ordination is not a civil right, while we may love and welcome a chronic alcoholic in our Christian family, we may have serious reservations about their ability to function as an ordained pastor. Morality matters and for some of us morality begins with the simple idea of loving what the law call us to do. Since there is no other sexual relationship in scripture but that of the marriage of one man and one woman, then ordination should be reserved for those who intend to live in faithful commitment in marriage or be celibate. The Scripture is not a culturally bound book that thought of slavery as an acceptable norm. How many of us are familiar with the Exodus narrative? And just what was that about? Was it not a story about God using Moses to lead His people out of slavery? Guess that shows us what God thinks about slavery. Our church, and I beg to seriously differ with Dr. McCarver, is not being counter-cultural. While I love the Church, I contend with Dr. Yeago that the ELCA is in impaired communion. As I understand that, we are already divided. Where this leads I do not know, but yesterday was, at the very least, open and fair to all involved. Later, perhaps tomorrow, I have a quotation from Dr. Yeago that summarizes the state of the crisis.

Ambivalence

2010-02-05T15:51:00.002-05:00

Mixed feelings best describes my reflections on the South Carolina Synod sponsored, Day of Holy Conversation. We meet tomorrow at Newberry College and will listen, once again, to two presentations. Dr. Yeago will present the, what shall we call it, traditionalist side and Dr. Susan McCarver will present the revisionist side. I have never felt more confused and conflicted in all of my years in service to the Church. People's feelings will no doubt be hurt and I wonder just how all of this is the Church. I do recall, however, that Paul and Barnabas went separate ways, but was all of this necessary? Someone used the analogy years ago of boiling a frog as an appropriate image to depict the efforts to change ministry policies for homosexuals. The frog is put in the cold water and the heat is slowly elevated until the frog no longer tries to climb out of the pot. Slowly but surely we have discussed this to the point that many of the laity will simply decide either it is no big deal or they will find another denomination to call their spiritual home. Perhaps they will pursue a third option - staying in the ELCA and clinging to their interpretation of orthodoxy. Whatever the case, one has to wonder if all of this is worth it. God is in charge, just not sure where this is going. We shall see.

Interpretive principles.......

2010-01-21T21:53:00.004-05:00

A reader writes, "In regards to earlier posts and also this one, I am still unclear of what your biblical hermeneutic is. You express one that says the Bible has authority on some things, but not on others. The things upon which you claim that authority holds up also happen to be the ones which support your views. For the sake of those confused, could you please expand upon this at some point?"

Mark, what do you wish to know? 1. Scripture is interpreted by using scripture. 2. There is a clear and plain meaning. God does not with to confuse us. 3. We read through the lens of Christ who came not to abolish the law and the prophets, but to fulfill them. 4. The Holy Spirit enlightens our reading, but would never violate the written word. You say, "my views?" Again, please remember that these are the views of the majority of readers of scripture. If you are confused, then perhaps you are listening to too many voices. I laugh at the ELCA's insistence that we listen to all the voices. I only care to hear the clear voice of my Lord as he speaks to me through the Holy Scripture.

Holy Spirit at work in CWA 09

2010-01-21T07:48:00.004-05:00

"1A. Proclaiming the Gospel is about speaking the truth. It seems apparant to me that the Holy Spirit was at work in the ELCA. Are you saying that this vote was one that was the result of money? and also that those who have been praying for the Spirit's guidance on this for quite some time have not really been praying?"

The gospel is not the gospel of inclusion. Google the phrase and you will see the tenets of this doctrine. Jesus is the gospel and Jesus spoke clearly about sexual relationships, see it in Matthew 19:4-6. What could be more clear Mark? As for the Holy Spirit speaking in the ELCA, does the Holy Spirit speak in contradiction to the Holy Word? No. And yes, the vote was political and motivated by self interests. Listen to the speeches again. How many times did we hear, "I," "me" and "my" experience. Sorry it is not about you and me, but solely about God. As for those who have been praying for the changes, guess they are choosing to ignore Genesis, Song of Solomon, Romans 1, 1 Corinthians 6 and all the images of scripture that portrays male and female imagery. Sorry Mark, but the changes are not supported by scripture in any way whatsoever. Perhaps you could join the other voices who use the language that Dr. Peterson and Bishop Hanson use, "The biblical writers did not understand orientation as we do today." As you may know, Dr. Walter Wink said that the biblical judgment on same gender relationships is wrong! At least he admits that it is not there. Has the Holy Spirit deserted the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox church in this manner? They continue to represent the far greater numbers of Christians in the world and we are but a tiny sect, perhaps a lost and no longer viable voice of Christianity?

Vote at CWA 09 done fairly? Really?

2010-01-19T22:03:00.004-05:00

The following is a comment from one of our dedicated readers,

"Regardless of the total votes, whether liberals out numbered conservatives, the simple earthy truth is we followed our own governing constitution, we followed our rules prayerfully and spiritually established and reformed since our founding as the ELCA, the modern Lutheran Church in America."

May I respectfully disagree? I believe that we have not done this prayerfully, but rather with the 200,000 grant from a foundation that promotes GLBT agenda. While we prayed over each vote, the implication that we have done this above board and fairly is not true. I attended the 2001, 2005 and 2007 Churchwide assembly as a voting member and saw things and parliamentary efforts that were anything but fair. For instance, during one assembly it was apparent that individuals wanting change had caucused and planned to control the microphones. No, this agenda was set before 1992 when Braaten and other theologians held the Call to Faithfulness conference. In 1997 at the ELCA National youth gathering Steve Rohr addressed the youth and he said in his speech, "Come in and come out." In the last youth gathering the committee selected Jay Baker who is a known advocate for full gay rights in the church. This I might add was before the churchwide voted. Is it fair for our youth to be subjected to teachings and leaders who represent a teaching not yet approved? Again, there is nothing fair about what has happened, and that is the way I see it. So, let it be known that some of us intend to never let this die, but will continue to attempt to reform this church and re-establish its orthodoxy. Unless, of course, the errors and arrogance grow so deep that we can no longer tolerate it. Sorry for sounding a bit strong in this post, but I am deeply hurt by this churches apparent disregard for the great tradition and the authority of scripture.

Blessing or not?

2010-01-18T14:21:00.003-05:00

I have said repeatedly that the ELCA did not approve a rite of blessing. One reader of this blog says that is the intention. Well, I beg to differ. These are the exact words from the ELCA web site.

"Does this mean the ELCA has endorsed the blessing of same-gender unions?No, the assembly was not asked to consider and thus took no action concerning a churchwide rite of blessing. The assembly’s action means that a congregation, however, is permitted to find ways to hold publicly accountable same-gender relationships that intend to be lifelong and monogamous and to surround these couples and their families with prayer and support in a variety of ways. The action adopted does not require any congregation to do so. The fourth resolution does require public accountability of anyone in such a relationship who seeks to be an ELCA pastor, deaconess, diaconal minister, or associate in ministry."

This I contend is one of the misguided efforts of the CWA 09. On the one hand we cannot reach a consensus, but on the other hand we recommend PALMS can be ordained and then we say we did not approve a rite of blessing. So, if the relationship is not blessed, what is it?

Anonymous revisited....

2010-01-17T21:50:00.004-05:00

I enjoy the conversations and the comments from all the individuals who post. I realize that there is criticism for those who post anonymously, but please remember I set it up that way. You have a choice in how you post. One commenter referred to another anonymous post as a "faceless fool," a comment which I hope will be further explained or even an apology offered. Anonymous posts are allowed so that anyone can express their opinion and do so without being known if they so choose. As to the comment from Mark, "Would you be willing to say that in your application of "hate the sin, love the sinner" in this case that to really love someone who considers themselves "homosexual" would involve praying, encouraging, hoping, and forming them into "heterosexuals"?" Mark, that is a good question. Let me state that I do not "form" anyone. I believe that Jeremiah 18 illustrates what I hold to be the case for all people. I am clay and God is the potter. God forms, shapes and transforms me. God is all powerful and can do whatever He chooses to do including the transformation of someone's sexual preferences. Clearly, at least to me, Genesis is as clear as can be, God's order is for Adam (man) to have a help mate, Eve. Jesus re-affirmed this teaching in Matthew 19:4-6. Therefore, there is one biblical expression for sexual intimacy. If anything, it is my responsibility and all of ours who hold to traditional interpretations of scripture that the ELCA has taken the actions it has. All along we should have been clearly teaching the beauty of romantic love between a man and a woman as articulated in the Song of Solomon, but I personally did not think it necessary. Now, Dr. Peterson as well as others make the case for the revisionist position by saying, "the biblical writers did not understand orientation as we do today." That statement grieves my heart. It all settles out to how we view scripture. Is it fallible, culturally conditioned, and in error regarding the order of creation as one man and one woman? If it is, then you and I Mark are simply going to have a difficult time discussing any issue.

Pastors for Sensible Conversation

2010-01-14T23:01:00.004-05:00

Tonight I attended the meeting of Revisionists with a presentation by Dr. Brian Peterson. He did a good job of putting forth the arguments. He said, as has Bishop Hanson, that the biblical writers did not understand same sex orientation as we do today. He also gave clarity to what the church actually did, though I seemed to hear him use the word "bless," which the church did not approve. The proper language is "recognize, support, and hold publicly accountable." Bishop Yoos gave a homily in which he shared four love stories of people from both camps. The message was good and filled with hope. He also intimated that any efforts to bind the conscience of a synod would be ruled out of order. We shall see. Questions from the floor revealed a bit of angst about using the word "sides" as in we are on different "sides" of the issue. The word camp was used by the Bishop to help with the concern. Others expressed dismay at the suggestion the SC Synod would seek "Legistlative options." If we are not different "sides," what are we? If the CWA 09 passed motions and did "legislative" stuff, then the Synod cannot? Overall, the tone was good, even though Dr. Peterson did throw out a few loaded words for those of us who are in the "traditional" camp, such as fundamentalists. Needless to say, though I listened intently and have read his paper on the CWA 09 decisions, I stand unconvinced. The real question remains, can two very different groups of people exist together with two very different understandings of scripture? Sadly, at least at this moment, I have serious doubts. It deeply disappoints me and saddens me when we say that the biblical writers do not know something. It grieves me when we connect concepts of hospitality and welcome with behavior as if we must accept certain behavior in order to be truly welcoming. I dare say that Augustine's words, "love the sinner and hate the sin," are no longer appropriate in the ELCA. Below is a link to Dr. Crumley's remarks at our meeting on January 9th.

http://reformfromwithin.com/downloads/Remarks%20of%20Dr.%20Crumley.pdf

Women and Ordination

2010-01-12T19:12:00.002-05:00

From the line of comments in the most recent post and others, it appears right and good to put forth some points for consideration on the ordination of women. First, let us use the name Elizabeth as our representative woman to be ordained. Elizabeth, a woman, is a state of being, not doing. A PALMS person is participating in sexual activity that has no basis in scripture, thus is precluded from ordination. One is a state of being - being a woman, the other is doing. Secondly, those who use proof text such as 1 Corinthians 14 to suggest that the bible is conflicted in its approach to women misunderstand the context of the Corinthian church. Plus, this rule is not universally applied for all time. If it were there would be no Deborah as Judge of Israel some 1400 years prior. Secondly, if God is intentional in all that He does then consider that women were the first at the tomb entrusted with the message of the risen Jesus. Paul mentions women in Romans 16 in his list of leaders. Guess they are SILENT leaders - you think. Paul does not deserve the interpretation so often assigned to him that he did not want women in leadership. Not true. These two issues; PALMS and the ordination of women are simply not related for a multitude of reasons.

Crumley - What to do?

2010-01-10T18:40:00.001-05:00

My notes from Crumley's speech on Saturday noted three responses to the CWA 09 actions. First, be realistic about the problem. While some congregations and pastors have gone along as though nothing happened (at times I too have played that denial game), the CWA 09 made a radical shift in how we interpret scripture. There is, however, much misinformation. For instance individuals continue to assert that the CWA 09 approved the blessing of same gender unions and that is not the case. The CWA approved that we recognize, support and hold publicly accountable PALMS. This is a far cry from blessing. It is important to note, however, that some have interpreted this action as the same as a blessing and as one who suports the changes told me, the blessing is implied. Two sets of clergy will follow these actions as well as two different congregations. Can we live together with such different understandings of scripture? Second, concentrate on what we have. We belong to THE church and our salvation is assured in Jesus Christ. We have the gospel to preach and the sacraments to administer. We have the scripture to read and prayers to offer. Third, we ask the question of ourselves, What is God's plan? These are my notes on Crumley's speech, what are your thoughts?

Orthodox Lutherans Gather in Lexington SC

2010-01-09T20:59:00.004-05:00

Today about 475 individuals gathered to hear the traditional understanding of scripture in regard to marriage. We gathered for worship first of all and then moved to the fellowship hall to hear from former bishop of the LCA, James Crumley. Jim was a true gentleman, but clear in his opposition to the ministry changes of CWA 09. The attendance was overwhelming, but demonstrates that many individuals are disturbed by the lack of biblical clarity over CWA 09 changes. The demeanor of the meeting was professional but clear. I saw a glimmer of hope for the South Carolina Synod believing that the possibility to pass a resolution to bind the conscience of the synod is possible. I will elaborate on specific content of Crumley's words and my reflections, tomorrow.

Augsburg Fortress issues statement to rumors...

2010-01-02T09:37:00.003-05:00

"We have been responding to unfounded rumors that we are changing the content of our faith formation resources for children, youth & adults ever since the August churchwide assembly when the voting members made decisions related to issues of human sexuality. But, as you know, rumors are tough to wrestle to the ground (all parish pastors have certainly dealt with this challenge from time to time!) Here is our statement re: these rumors:"Augsburg Fortress has no plans for the foreseeable future to change the content of our resources related to any of the actions of the recent ELCA Churchwide Assembly. Our focus continues to be on creating excellent group use faith formation & worship resources for congregations and excellent text & reference materials for higher education. We seek to provide resources that encourage thoughtful dialogue on all matters of importance to the church. We will continue to provide outstanding resources to serve a broad spectrum of congregations and educational institutions."

The preceding was a response by Beth Lewis to a post on another blog. How can the publishing house, an official arm of the ELCA not consider resources that embrace Option 4 of HSGT? I contend that they cannot. With all due respect to the traditionalists in our church and publishing house, I know they are there, I see no way to resist the pressure to publish something along the lines of, "The Christian Heather has Two Mommies!" Why should a PALM Pastor (don't you just love the new language of this church) not want publications such as this? Option 4 individuals will stop at nothing to full inclusion which will include the indoctrination (should I say proper biblical social justice teaching) of children. For instance, I attended the 1997 National ELCA Youth Gathering. At that event Mr. Steve Rohr, one of the speakers, said, "Come in and come out." And he was not referring to coming out of some spiritual darkness. 30,000 young people heard him speak of his special friend Yanni and his challenge to change the ELCA and its attitudes regarding same sex sexual relationships. This happened in 1997 and now the GLBT SIG (special interest group) has the authority of the CWA 09. The fact is that the CWA 09 gave the publishing house the right to publish the writings of Robert Gagnon and Walter Wink! As for me and the congregation I serve, Walter's writings will not be used in our Day Care Ministry.

What to do?

2009-12-30T17:09:00.003-05:00

A comment with one of my readers illustrates there is common ground and I want to be the first to acknowledge it. All of us know "PALMS" (Publically accountable, life-long, monogamous, same gender relationships) who wish to grow in their relationship with Jesus Christ. Perhaps that is a beginning place for an affirmation of agreement between revisionists and traditionalists. Which leads me to contemplate the possibility of an, "Affirmation of Agreements." It could be a good start for conversation and dialogue. We know, all too well, the disagreements which I will not reflect upon in this post. Let us just ponder, for now, how our love for Jesus can bring us to further dialogue.

In Memory of Dr. Richard Carl Hoefler

2009-12-27T16:50:00.003-05:00

The phone rang. It was Dr. Hoefler. "I am preparing my will and would like to leave you all my notes, sermons and lectures, would that be Ok?" Startled and speechless, I did not know what to say. Today, my office is filled with Dr. Hoefler's notes, illustrations, manuscripts and sermons. He was the professor of preaching at LTSS for forty years. Here is an excerpt from a sermon prepared for today's text from Luke 2:41ff. "Ah, yes, how the minds eye quickly catches the young lad standing amid the 'intelligentsia' of the temple set, tunic unruffled, eyes glancing heavenward, dazzling them with his clear and precise answers to the questions they've been asking for years! This kid's a marvel, one of them says. He's a regular boy wonder! Hasn't missed a question yet!" Dr. Hoefler understood the gospel and preached with clarity. Thank God for servants of the church such as he.

What is in a name anyway?

2009-12-24T09:25:00.004-05:00

Names are limited by the nuances of our language and cannot always convey the fullness intended. For instance, Lutherans Concerned is an organization founded to work for the full inclusion of GLBT's. Their stance is full acceptance of sexual preferences. Another organization, Goodsoil, has the same intentions. By contrast does this mean that those of us who respectfully disagree with the revisionist (more about that name in another post) are "bad soil," or "Lutherans unconcerned?" Also, I hear there is a group convening in South Carolina using the term, "Pastor's for Sensible Conversation." Does that mean that those of us who are not revisionist are not sensible? In an effort to make clear our distinctions, we respectfully chose a name, Orthodox Lutherans-South Carolina. Our Bishop requested that we not use the term "conservative," but preferred we use either "traditional," or "orthodox." While these latter two terms have already created some consternation among a few, what else are we to do? Clearly, we wish to speak the truth, but do so in all love and compassion. Orthodox Christians believe that God sets limits around our behavior, limits that we may not fully understand. Our authority is scripture. While I know that the children's rhyme, "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me," is not true, and names can hurt, we are pastors and intend no harm by our choice of names. Rather, all who follow Jesus want the same outcome, to be obedient to God. No matter what name is chosen, distinctions and serious differences exist in interpretations about obedience and there is no avoiding it. My thanks to several of my "orthodox" friends who articulated these thoughts for my reflection.

Merry Christmas

2009-12-23T17:58:00.001-05:00

May all of you enjoy the blessings of Christmas and the joy of Jesus.

Rebuke - O - Meter

2009-12-19T14:39:00.003-05:00

One of our anonymous readers used the term "Rebuke - O - Meter" in a recent response. While I absolutely love to use parody, sarcasm and a whole host of other literary devices, this phrase is an interesting one. So reflecting on that term I have to ask when do we see this in scripture? The most known instance is when Jesus tells his disciples about his upcoming suffering and death. Peter challenges this and Jesus rebukes Peter. So, to sum it up succinctly, Jesus has full rebuking rights!

Priority One

2009-12-19T14:17:00.005-05:00

Just what are our priorities as Christians? I propose as the number one priority commandment one, "You shall have no other gods before me." God tells us that He establishes a relationship with us. God initiates that relationship and values it so greatly that He tell us that He is a jealous God. God is all powerful, all knowing and all present - the three "omni's." God deserves our full obedience and allegiance. When Jesus was asked to define the most important commandment he replied, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your strength and all your mind and your neighbor as yourself." Loving God and one another is our first priority. This is defined clearly in the parable of the Good Samaritan. In this story Jesus illustrates the priority of serving and helping people in need. While there are plenty of finer points of theology to discuss, nothing is more important than our priority with love of God and love of neighbor.

Bend the Dogma

2009-12-14T09:37:00.003-05:00

Sitting in their living room I introduced myself as their new pastor. The scheduled visit served the purpose of getting to know one another. After the normal small talk, the elderly couple surprised me with this comment, "We believe in re-incarnation, what do you think about it?" Sensing this was a no-win situation I asked what brought them to this belief. Finally, I said what I should have said all along, "Christians do not believe in re-incarnation." They were visibly disturbed by my assertion. My efforts to reassure them that the central tenet of our faith, resurrection from the dead, did not seem to appease. How is it that such beliefs infiltrate the ranks of believers? This, among the many other unbiblical spiritual systems, continues to sneak under the radar of orthodoxy. Check out the following link, an opinion piece by Charles M. Blow, sent to me by a good friend. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/opinion/12blow.html?emc=eta1 My effort in this blog is not to malign any belief system nor persons, but to articulate as clearly as I can the fundamental tenets of the Christian faith. Blow zeroes in on the problem when he states, "The report is further evidence that Americans continue to cobble together Mr. Potato Head-like spiritual identities from a hodgepodge of beliefs — bending dogmas to suit them instead of bending themselves to fit a dogma." What belief would you prefer to our Lord's call to serve one another? What belief of the day suits you better than the tired and worn orthodoxy passed on to us? After all, apparently culture seems to be winning today. (2 Timothy 4:3) Piece it all together and give it a name. How about using your name, say Sheila and add "ism." Then you could have your own religion, "Sheilaism." See Robert Bellah, Habits of the Heart for further details on "Sheliaism." There is a purity of faith and doctrine that holds me accountable and often reminds me of my shortcomings, but I dare not change it to make me feel better.

Red Sea?

2009-12-12T14:24:00.002-05:00

It was my first religion class at USC-Columbia in 1976. The professor made comment that the Red Sea crossing never happened. I listened to his logic, but thought I was not ready to give up the historicity of that event and I am still not ready to do that. It was interesting to note, however, that one of our classmates was greatly disturbed. Finally, in a move of desperation, the professor silenced the offended student and talked with him outside of class. Christians who love Jesus and follow his path are all over the continuum on such events as the Red Sea and other supernatural events of scripture. Once I had another pastor give me a mini-lecture on how Lutheran's read the bible. He used the language of "canon within a canon," "cradle that holds the Christ child," and all the tools we have come to know as historical criticial method. His implication was that I and many on the side of orthodoxy in sexual matters simply do not know these things. For the record, that is not true either. So let us put to rest that those on opposing sides of the sexuality debate are ignorant of scripture. We all love the scripture and love Jesus. The premier question is one of hermeneutics. (Don't you just love those nice seminary words?) Seriously, how do we interpret the meaning of the text in our context and our time? That is the defining question. It appears to me and my logic and Holy Spirit insight that no-one has a definitive reason from scripture to change the orthodox teaching of one man and one woman as the only relationship God affirms for sexual intimacy. The debate over teachings and ordination are different questions from hospitality and welcome. All are welcome in our fellowship - always and forever.

A Bible Just For Me....

2009-12-11T19:13:00.003-05:00

Lance, you gave me a great idea. Perhaps we should market the bible in various forms. A bible with miracles eliminated for the more scientific minded, a bible for fragile folks that takes out offensive passages, one for pacifists that eradicates all references to Old Testament battles, one for universalist with no references to Hell, a gender neutral one for those who find God as Father outdated, and my favorite - one with absolutely no reference to speaking in tongues. Never understood that anyway. With bibles such as this we could have a religion that suits all, offends none, and transforms no-one. We could celebrate the psychology of the sixties, "I'm ok, you're ok." We could start our own religion sort of like those persons who decided to start a Jedi-Knight religion. Check it out at www.jedichurch.org. On second thought, do not check it out.

The Sixth Commandment

2009-12-11T10:15:00.002-05:00

The ELCA constitution boldly states that we confess belief in the Small Catechism. Given, however, the recent changes at CWA 09, do we? Consider Luther's explanation to commandment number six.

You shall not commit adultery.
What does this mean?
We should fear and love God so that we lead a sexually pure and decent life in
what we say and do, and husband and wife love and honor each other.

Will this be rewritten? Will it state that domestic partners love and honor each other? And if indeed it is suggested that we rewrite this, what will be the next document to be submitted to the revisionist pen? How about, "You shall have no other gods before me." Perhaps this one should state, "In order to COEXIST (a subtle reference to bumper stickers) we will tolerate other gods before us." Now this has a nice soft and gentle feel to it, don't you think? God did not really mean that we are to proclaim Jesus Christ as the Way, the Truth and the Life. Or did He? Oops, sorry for the He for God, guess that should be SHIM? The bottom line is this for me - people can believe and practice whatever they want as I have no desire to control the lives of others, but as a follower of Jesus Christ we have a path to follow. We either respect God's Word or we try to wiggle our way around it to suit our own wishes and desires. As I see it, there is a lot of wiggling going on.

January 9th, 2010 - St. Stephens, Lexington SC

2009-12-10T23:51:00.003-05:00

The Orthodox Lutherans of South Carolina will meet, clergy and laity, on January 9th, 2010 at St. Stephens Lutheran Church, Lexington, SC. Our guest speaker is The Reverend Jim Crumley. Many of you will remember that Jim is the former Bishop of the LCA. He is a gracious servant of the church and we are thankful that he will speak in favor of the Orthodox view of the Holy Scriptures at our gathering. We welcome all lay persons, rostered leaders and any others. We will worship, pray and fellowship together. Please circulate the word and join us on this most important date. We will be offering a resolution for consideration at our synodical day of holy conversation and one for consideration at our synod assembly.

The Bible Tells Me So or Not

2009-12-09T21:22:00.004-05:00

Associated Press - 12/7/2009 7:20:00 AM

CHICAGO - The presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is suggesting that the Bible isn't the last word on homosexuality. In a town hall meeting Sunday, Bishop Mark Hanson said, "the understanding we have of homosexuality today does not seem to be reflected at all in the context of the biblical writers." Therefore, he said, Lutherans should consider more modern views on sexual orientation.

The above excerpt is from the AP and defines clearly the state of our church. Is the bible authoritative for all time or not? Are the biblical writers biased by their culture, particularly in regards to the human condition? How is the bible inspired by the Holy Spirit? Is it just another piece of inspired literature or does it possess supernatural inspiration? Those who hold to a "high" view of scripture believe that the scriptures speak to all time and places and is our authority for teaching and reproof. (2 Timothy 3:16) So, our national Bishop states that the biblical writers, inspired by God, really do not understand sexuality as we do. I humbly and sincerely disagree. Now I know some will point to women's ordination, slavery, perhaps even polygamy as examples of biblical mishaps, but none of these have the whole witness or context of scripture in their support. Our church adopted a teaching document that teaches in accord with what, the scripture? On sexuality- no. Therefore we are in violation of scripture and our church constitution. We no longer have any true measure of authority so polygamy could by our own measures and reasons now be legitimate and frankly has more support than the blessing of same gender relationships.

Reflections on Townhall

2009-12-07T16:56:00.001-05:00

First, I am thankful to be a part of a denomination that utilizes all means of communication. The Townhall on Sunday afternoon at 4:30 was an excellent way to connect and communicate with lay and rostered leaders. As usual, Bishop Hanson seemed energized. One person asked what should the traditionalists do since we are a minority dissident voice. Hanson responded with clarity that we are not a dissident voice, but that HSGT (Human Sexuality Gift and Trust) allows for Option One persons to speak their views with integrity. So, for that I am deeply thankful. On the other hand, Hanson expressed that Gay and Lesbian Christians can now feel fully welcomed since our changes at CWA 09. Can we not express radical hospitality and welcome while at the same time maintaining the truth of scripture? I realize that Timothy Wengert and other scholars have articulated positions from scripture, but truthfully their arguments are all quite weak. At least Dr. Walter Wink had the audacity to say that in these matters the biblical judgment is not correct. There is a lot of ambiguity from the CWA 09 and clearly the Bishops and others are worried about the fallout of these decisions. Overall, Hanson seemed determined to say to folks like myself – orthodox, that we need to continue to teach according to our beliefs. So, for all out there who insist on name calling, schismatic, CORE crazies, hate-mongers, bigots, fill in the blank, please refrain from doing so as I am doing what Bishop Hanson has asked me to do!

Faith Formation Begins with Children

2009-12-01T21:52:00.004-05:00

I am concerned. Concerned for Christianity in the United States and our declining educational emphases. Perhaps I am blinded by my limited vision as a mainline Christian, but clearly there is a serious drop in Sunday school attendance and a deep dearth of desire for lifelong learning. A dear friend related to me today that he is the youngest regular attendee at his congregation. Since he exceeds my age (51) by a few years, then his congregation like so many others has no children. Is it an issue of priorities? Are families so stressed by so many tasks that there is little commitment to teach their children the fundamentals of the faith? Or is there apathy about spiritual matters? Though we attended a small congregation when I was a child, there was great attention given to Sunday school classes. I remember learning about martyrs of the faith in a small fifth grade Sunday school class. Seminary was not the first time I heard about Polycarp and Boniface. But it seems the priority for faith formation through bible stories and learning is secondary to soccer, football, basketball, baseball, dance, and a whole host of other great and beneficial activities. My life as an adult is enriched by the bible stories I learned as a child. I pray that we find creative ways to re-engage our children in learning about Moses, Abraham, and especially the story about the bald headed prophet! Now go look that one up.

Kairos - Prison Ministry

2009-11-29T21:15:00.005-05:00

I went kicking and screaming, well sort of, to my Kairos weekend at Lee Correctional. Glenn and Harold, coaxed me into it and it was a weekend I shall never forget. I sat at a table with four residents (read inmates) and other Kairos workers. I was one of the chaplains at the four day retreat and felt the added burden of hearing confessions. My intentions were to immerse myself in the ministry completely and fully and that is what I did. I began to listen to the stories of these men, all incarcerated for life. Slowly, I began to see them as human beings with deep hurts, but also still capable of manipulation, a trait they had learned most of their life. When I learned of the murders that many of the group had committed, I wanted to hate these men, but could not. The men of Kairos who work these weekends and visit every month exhibit a deep love and compassion that only can come from God. On one particular session we sat in chapel service, jammed in like sardines with all of our voices singing loudly, ours mingled with theirs. It was powerful and God's presence was felt. God changes lives and I saw God's power first hand at Lee Correctional Institution one weekend. God bless the men and women who are so dedicated to this worthwhile ministry.

Celebration of Discipline

2009-11-28T18:44:00.002-05:00

The most treasured book in my library was given to me by my wife on my 27th birthday. The book, Celebration of Discipline by Richard Foster was life changing. Foster writes of inward, outward, and corporate disciplines, but more importantly places such spiritual practices as fasting in a new light. Fasting is a discipline, but one we celebrate. Discipline is lacking in American Christianity in many places. We have too often equated material abundance with spiritual depth. We witness individuals fighting for the newest and cheapest, while standing in lines overnight on Thanksgiving night. Is the saving of fifteen dollars on something we do not need so important? We want what we want and when we want it, even our so - called spiritual food. Creeds are written to reflect the current trends. Music is dispensed as if the feeling of the worshiper is more important than the theological content. Disobedience in the church is a nuisance rather than an opportunity for reflection and repentance. The Christian church needs radical obedience to Jesus Christ. While the church is not perfect, far from it, its teachings and doctrines should be greater than our ability to fulfull but always something for which we strive. Now, however, we are all bound to our own conscience - a ridiculous concept at best. Can one have discipline when one's own conscience is the guide? For those who think I am totally critical, there is good news. Jesus Christ is Lord and his work on the cross secures my salvation and his Holy Spirit calls me to faith. May we all have the discipline to read the scripture regularly, pray fervently, and exercise our spiritual muscles often. God's truth will prevail.

Manhattan Declaration

2009-11-22T21:09:00.002-05:00

The link below is a site in which a number of Evangelical, Orthodox and Catholic Cchristians have signed to demonstrate their commitment to the sanctity of life, the institution of the family and the right of religious liberty. Check it out.

http://manhattandeclaration.org

Comments on Synod Resolutions

2009-11-20T09:26:00.003-05:00

The term "bound conscience" espoused by our church is fraught with problems. But since it is the term in use by our church, what does it mean? Apparently, individuals can hold to their own unique view in regard to the interpretation of the scripture particularly as it pertains to sexuality. So this begs the question, can synods exist together as a bound conscience? In the case of South Carolina previous votes indicate that the majority of those in attendance at Synod Assemblies oppose any change to ministry policies, (i.e. Vision and Expectations) This does not include the thousands of others who do not vote at Synod Assemblies who, if my inclination is correct, oppose any changes as well. The Northeastern Iowa Synod has blazed the trail for other Synods. What will be most interesting is the response of Churchwide. On the one hand we say that we want to respect differences, while on the other we implement a change that has caused serious theological crisis and divisiveness in many congregations. Churchwide will challenge the right of Synods to bind candidacy committees and synods, but should they do so they will indicate by actions that the real intent is not to allow dissent but to squash it. Perhaps Churchwide officers could issue a papal Bull. In which case many of us would be obliged to have a papal bull burning party. Now that could be fun!

Northeastern Iowa Synod Resolution

2009-11-20T09:23:00.001-05:00

A RESOLUTION ON THE “BOUND CONSCIENCE” OF THE NORTHEASTERN IOWA SYNOD WITH RESPECT TO CHANGES IN MINISTRY POLICIES
WHEREAS, The 2009 Churchwide Assembly of the ELCA has adopted 4 Recommendations on Ministry Policies (CA09.05.23; CA09.05.24; CA09.05.26; and CA09.05.27), and
WHEREAS, CA09.05.23 states “that in the implementation of any resolutions on ministry policies, the ELCA commit itself to bear one another’s burdens, love the neighbor, and respect the bound consciences of all”, and
WHEREAS, CA09.05.27, in the 2nd “RESOLVED” states “that this church, because of its
commitment to respect the bound consciences of all, declare its intent to allow structured flexibility in decision-making regarding the approving or disapproving in candidacy and the extending or not extending of a call to rostered service of a person who is otherwise qualified and who is living or contemplates living in a publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship”, and
WHEREAS, the 5th “WHEREAS” introducing CA.09.05.27 states,” other members, congregations, candidacy committees, and synods of the ELCA acknowledge those gifts and skills for ministry, but believe that this church must maintain an expectation of celibacy for any gay or lesbian person, whether or not that person is in a publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship, and thus believe that this church cannot call or roster people in such relationships” and
WHEREAS, the use of “structured flexibility” is portrayed in the “Report and Recommendation on Ministry Policies” as presented to the Churchwide Assembly on lines 488 – 498 of the Pre-Assembly Report in the following manner:
"To choose structured flexibility does not imply that same-gender-oriented people in publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationships would be able to serve everywhere in this church. The existing discernment processes for approval and call already assume that synods, bishops, candidacy committees, rostered leaders, and congregations will make decisions in keeping with their own conscience and convictions. If structured flexibility were added to the process, this assumption would still protect any congregation, candidacy committee, synod, or bishop from having to violate bound conscience by approving, calling, commissioning, consecrating, or ordaining anyone in a publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship. Similarly, a structured flexibility process would protect the decisions of a congregation, candidacy committee, synod, or bishop who concludes that mission would be served best by approving or calling a particular candidate or rostered leader who is in a publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship." (bold added), and
WHEREAS, it is evident from these portions of the materials adopted and presented at the 2009 Churchwide Assembly that the “all” whose “bound conscience” the actions of the assembly have committed the ELCA to honor include “synods”, and that this “bound conscience” includes the ability to choose not to approve, call, commission, consecrate, or ordain someone in a publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship, and
WHEREAS, the “bound conscience” of the Northeastern Iowa Synod can most clearly be determined by the actions taken at synod assembly, and
WHEREAS, actions of the Northeastern Iowa Synod Assembly in 2004 (SA04.06.9), 2005 (SA05.06.38), 2007 (SA07.06.33, SA07.06.36, SA07.06.38 & SA07.06.41), and 2009 (SA09.06.15 & SA09.06.18) have declared the position of the Northeastern Iowa Synod to be that “Marriage, an institution ordained by God, is the life-long union of one man and one woman for the creation of human life and for their mutual love and care… Sexual intercourse is part of the vocation of marriage and is misused in any other context” (SA04.06.9); have opposed any changes in the church’s teaching concerning marriage and sexuality (SA04.06.9, SA09.06.15); and have opposed any changes in the ELCA’s standards for pastors and other rostered leaders as expressed in the 1990 documents “Vision and Expectations” and “Definitions and Guidelines for Discipline” (SA05.06.38, SA07.06.36, SA07.06.38, SA07.06.41 & SA09.06.18); therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Northeastern Iowa Synod Council, recognizing the past actions of the Northeastern Iowa Synod Assembly as evidence of the Northeastern Iowa Synod’s strongly-held views with respect to the approving, calling, commissioning, consecrating, or ordaining of one in a publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship, determines that the standards for rostered ministry as outlined in the 1990 documents, “Vision and Expectations” and “Definitions and Guidelines for Discipline” shall remain in effect for the Northeastern Iowa Synod, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Northeastern Iowa Synod Council encourage the Northeastern Iowa Synod Candidacy Committee and the Office of Bishop of the Northeastern Iowa Synod to continue to abide by such standards for rostered ministry in the Northeastern Iowa Synod during the period leading up to the 2010 Synod Assembly, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Northeastern Iowa Synod Council recommends the following Continuing Resolution to the 2010 Synod Assembly of the Northeastern Iowa Synod:
S14.02 A10 In addition to the standards for ordained ministers in the current “Vision and Expectations” as adopted by the ELCA Church Council, this synod shall continue to maintain this expectation from “Vision & Expectations” (1990) in its candidacy process and in its standards for pastors and other rostered leaders:
Ordained ministers, whether married or single, are expected to uphold an understanding of marriage in their public ministry as well as in private life that is biblically informed and consistent with the teachings of this synod. The expectations of this synod regarding the sexual conduct of its ordained ministers are grounded in the understanding that human sexuality is a gift from God and that ordained ministers are to live in such a way as to honor this gift. Ordained ministers are expected to reject sexual promiscuity, the manipulation of others for purposes of sexual gratification, and all attempts of sexual seduction and sexual harassment, including taking physical or emotional advantage of others. Single ordained ministers are expected to live a chaste life. Married ordained ministers are expected to live in fidelity to their spouses, giving expression to sexual intimacy within a marriage relationship that is mutual, chaste, and faithful. Ordained ministers who are homosexual in their self-understanding are expected to abstain from homosexual sexual relationships.

Core Makes Announcement

2009-11-19T21:40:00.002-05:00

Lutheran Core announced plans to begin the process of a new Lutheran church in North America. I am a member of Core and greet this news with hope and sadness. Thankful that some will have a more orthodox place to stand in Lutheranism and sad for the pain in ELCA. How will this look and what will happen is unclear, but what we know for sure, there will be a major effort to secure a sense of authority and discipline for the new church. ELCA put into effect the Vision and Expectations document to give clarity of what is expected of rostered leaders, but did not enforce it. (I can specific examples, but will not.) Hopefully, the same mistakes will not be made and who knows a renewed sense of orthodoxy will emerge in ELCA. I pray for that.

Richard Hays New Testament Scholar

2009-11-16T20:05:00.002-05:00

Richard Hays is a New Testament scholar now teaching at Duke. His most recent book, The Moral Vision of the New Testament has an excellent section on homosexuality. His treatment represents the best I have read to date of one who is deeply compassionate while at the same time articulating a sensitive and caring traditional response. For instance, to the question, "Can homosexual persons be members of the Christian church?" He answers, "This is rather like asking, "Can envious persons be members of the church?" or "Can alcoholics be members of the church?" De facto, of course they are. Unless we think that the church is a community of sinless perfection, we must acknowledge that persons of homosexual orientation are welcome along with other sinners in the company of those who trust in the God who justifies the ungodly. If they are not welcome, I will have to walk out the door along with them, leaving in the sanctuary only those entitled to cast the first stone." Hays demonstrates the depth of compassion that warms my heart. He, however, at the same time, says that the church cannot bless unions (p. 402) and that homosexual Christians "should seek to live lives of disciplined sexual abstinence." (p. 401) The entire treatment of the subject is outstanding for its truth and grace. The conclusions and answers to practical questions are testimony to a scholar who dealt seriously with the text and compassionately with the subject. Richard Hays has helped me tremendously on this most difficult subject. I highly recommend his text. In contrast are those scholars who come to the text with a strong cultural influence. For instance this quotation leapt off the page at me, "As great-grandchildren of the Enlightenment, we like to think of ourselves as free moral agents, choosing rationally among possible actions, but Scripture unmasks that cheerful illusion and teaches us that we are deeply infected by the tendency to self-deception." (p. 390) Personally, it appears that there are a lot of intelligent New Testament scholars who are deceiving themselves and a whole lot of lay people. Again, Hays has done us all a favor with a text that is sensitive, caring, fair, deeply insightful, strictly exegetical, but also traditional. I hope it will make its way into the hands of many of our lay people.

Trainwreck Explained

2009-11-12T22:59:00.004-05:00

Obviously I struck a nerve with a reader by using "separatist" language and the word trainwreck. Perhaps I should clarify, first the word trainwreck. The word was not used to refer to revisionist or traditionalist (I realize that these words also agitated some on the Lutherans Persisting website - but know of no others to use), but was used as an image of what happens when two opposing views collide. That is all I am trying to say with the word. Two completely different views of sexuality collided at CWA 2009. Now, every congregation in the ELCA has to wrestle, whether they wish to or not, with that decision. Nothing more nor less is meant. Now, as to "separatist" language - I am not suggesting that this is a time to invoke the words of 2 Corinthians 6:13-15. Personally, I have not withdrawn in any way from my church. Though, it is getting quite difficult to stay positive when political means are used to vote on theological issues. There is Marcionism, Gnosticism, Antinomianism, and a creeping tendency to a different gospel running around in ELCA. Check out Galatians 1:8-9 to see what Paul has to say about a different gospel. Social Gospel, Justice and Inclusivity are mentioned more in our hierarchy than the radical atonement of Jesus Christ to save unworthy sinners from the wrath of God. While each of these in and of themselves is not a "different gospel," they are only mere components of the one good news of our salvation in Christ. I truly fear that the time may come when separatism will be not just words written but actions taken. I pray that does not happen. Keep reading and by all means challenge. I welcome it.

Binding Consciences in South Carolina

2009-11-12T22:30:00.002-05:00

It is our hope, and we are being completely transparent about it, that the South Carolina Synod can become a conscience bound synod. We realize, of course, that ELCA says that is not permissable, but with all candor, rules do not seem to matter to most of our blessed hierarchy. It is true that same gender blessings have been done and candidates have been ordained even when Vision and Expectation forbid it. So, for the ELCA to tell a Synod what we can or cannot do is like the pot calling the kettle black. Sorry, but that will not work in South Carolina. So, to answer my friend Marshall - out there - we will be transparent by letting our Bishop know. We will write a resolution and negotiate a strategy for our synod convention. We know our battle will be difficult and perhaps uphill, but we will not be deterred. We also have an attorney who is now a pastor working on our resolution. We will remind everyone that all persons are welcome in our churches, as this is not about hospitality, but about truthfulness and obedience to the authority of scripture. Finally, we will not go away not this year or next, but persist until the revisionist admit the error of their interpretation or Jesus returns. But, we will also keep other options open.

Reflections on Organizational Meeting of Orthodox Lutherans in SC

2009-11-10T16:02:00.003-05:00

A sigh of relief emerges from my tired body as I ponder a moment the seriousness of what took place this afternoon. Originally, those of us who held to the idea that marriage is the exclusive place for sexual intimacy in a life long bond of marriage between one man and one woman, are now feeling as though we are the opposition. We are, however, not against anything, but for marriage as defined in Holy Scripture. Our meeting today began with greetings from our host pastor, our Bishop, and worship. We moved to the fellowship hall for our discussion. Following our agenda as tightly as we could proved challenging, but we prevailed in that effort. Our keynoter gave us the options that will be presented to the congregation he serves. These options included one revisionist option and four others. The four others moved along the spectrum from assert the traditional views and stay to assert the traditional views and take more concerted action. The collegiality and fellowship was good and the conversation was positive. There was no anger, malice or ill will hurled at anyone. A true spirit of churchmanship prevailed with a clear consensus that ELCA is in serious error. A binding resolution was signed that officially provides our founding document as Orthodox Lutherans - South Carolina. A number of us present today are CORE supporters, while others are not. Together, however, we began the process to bind the conscience (this is ELCA speak - but I use it nevertheless) of our SC Synod. I must personally commend our Bishop on his positive pastoral presence. We are open, transparent and have nothing as a group to hide. We stand solidly on the authority of scripture with all humility and truth. May God guide us as we begin this endeavor.

Tomorrow

2009-11-09T20:34:00.002-05:00

Tomorrow is the day when the Orthodox Lutherans of South Carolina meet. I am excited and at the same time apprehensive. Excited to be around individuals who feel as I do that the ELCA is in serious error, and apprehensive due to the recent news that Synods cannot be conscience bound. In essence, ELCA has passed a social statement with the wide range of views regarding same gender sexual relations, while at the same time initiating practices that show full approval. We hope and pray that our numbers will be high and that pastors will speak their convictions with passion and love. No one needs to be maligned for us to speak truth and grace. ELCA has erred, seriously and there is probably no turning back from this trainwreck, but ELCA will know our presence. Eventually, history will record us in some way. I pray that it is one of faithful pastors who love the church, love Jesus, love our parishioners regardless of their sin, and love the Word so deeply that we cannot be quiet. I promise to not keep quiet - ever, orthodoxy will always have a voice, as long as I have one. Sola Deo Gloria!

Dr. Mark Ellingsen and Genetics

2009-11-03T08:33:00.004-05:00

Dr. Ellingson has posted an article at www.lutheranforum.org that details the scientific findings regarding same sex attraction. It seems there is evidence to suggest that some brains are wired with same sex attraction. But then he also demonstrates that some of us are born with a natural inclination to violence. In essence, scientific findings show what the wisdom of God's Word has stated all along, that the human condition is flawed. There is original sin that saturates us. Inclinations to sin are inborn. The gospel message is in jeopardy when we unsin what God calls sinful behavior. Whether we like it or not, all of us are under condemnation when left to ourselves. Only through the imputed righteousness of Christ are we brought into the eternal arms of our Heavenly Father's mercy. There is wrath. God abhors that which separates us from him. The Ten Commandments are explicit about our sexual relations when it states, "Thou shall not commit adultery." Luther in his explanation states that in matters of sex our actions are to be pure and honorable. Can sexual actions be pure and honorable when as even the revisionist Dr. Peterson says that the New Testament never mentions "same gender intercourse" (his phrase not mine) in a positive light? The logical answer is no. Again, let me reiterate in this blog spot that no-one should ever treat another human being with disrespect no matter their sin. But, this does not mean that we cannot hold one another accountable to a holiness in our lives in all aspects of our lives, even the bedroom!

Leaving a comment

2009-11-01T18:17:00.002-05:00

Should you try to leave a comment, there are several steps. First, choose anonymous contributor from the pull down menu. Second, write your comment. Third, hit preview. Fourth, enter the word verification. This prevents robotic spam. Finally, your comment should post just fine. I have not restricted comments so you can do this without being known. Shucks, flaming revisionists can even leave a post, imagine that!

Least in the Kingdom of Heaven?

2009-11-01T17:10:00.003-05:00

Matthew 5:17ff 17"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven." Teaching theology and scripture is serious business. While I know there is an abundance of teachings and interpretations regarding the Sacrament of the Altar, suffice it to say that there is much agreement on the significance of this holy meal. No one in the Christian church would disparage our Lord's Supper. In the same way we do not make light of those who are engaged in serious dialogue about matters of sexuality. I promise not to make light of revisionists, but expect the same respect. That does not mean we have to put on kid gloves to debate. The history and interpretations of the ages is on the side of the orthodox/traditional theologians. The biblical case was not made at CWA nor through all of the study done with "Journey Together Faithfully." Frankly, in my humble opinion the study was flawed from the very beginning when we stated we wanted to "hear all voices." We should only be interested in hearing the clear call of the Word of God. We do not decide our ethical positions on the basis of another person's experience, but rather the Holy Scripture. Clearly, Jesus underscores the importance of the Law, though there are some including many revisionists that keep wanting to divert the real issue by pointing to those things that we no longer observe. For example the post concerning mildew. To anyone who teaches in any way that would weigh human experiences over against the Word is in danger of being called, "least in the Kingdom of heaven." The chaos alone resulting from CWA 09 should be evidence enough that the church is in error. I make no apology for that diagnosis.

Benne on the ELCA and CWA

2009-10-31T21:24:00.002-04:00

Go to this blogspot for an excellent read. Dr. Robert Benne reflects on how the ELCA got to this point.

http://luthersdeerleg.blogspot.com/2009/09/bob-bennes-analysis-of-how-elca-has.html

Free Enterprise Under Assault?

2009-10-29T22:32:00.004-04:00

When something works well, why change? In our great country the economic engine that provides jobs, promotes personal responsibility, encourages philanthropy and enables individuals to climb out of poverty, is our free enterprise system. It is almost unthinkable that the U.S. chamber of commerce is launching a public campaign to preserve and promote our free market system. For the full details go to http://www.freeenterpriseamerica.com/ I am not so naive to think that Capitalism is God's preferred economic system. In fact I own a book by D. Laytham entitled, "God is Not; ... A Capitalist." I am willing to be critical of the system, but it is still far greater than anything else. Marxism has not worked and socialism squashes incentive. And now, we have a "hope and change" government that gives me little hope and will take even more of my change. Jobs are sorely needed, especially manufacturing and all our new visionaries of government want to do is increase the size of government and tax us into poverty. There are days that I bemoan the fact that Mark Texiera (Yankees First Baseman) signed a 180 million contract, but to do so is breaking the seventh commandment (Do not steal). Luther wrote, "We should fear and love God so that we do not take our neighbor's money or possessions, or get them in any dishonest way, but help him to improve and protect his possessions and income." We are to help others improve and protect their possessions and income. No jealousy or playing victimhood allowed. Free enterprise stirs creativity and builds self -respect. I am for free markets and unfettered Capitalism because I believe as a Christian it has the greatest potential to help the most people.

A New Testament Professor's Reflections

2009-10-28T21:04:00.004-04:00

One of the New Testament professors of our church suggests that we consider the bible seriously in our discussion regarding the ordination of PALMS. He writes, "The texts involved in this discussion must not be ignored or pushed to the side. However, the difficulty of interpreting them likewise cannot be ignored if we are going to take the authority of the texts seriously. We must face the texts we have, and not simpler texts that we wish for or imagine." He continues, "As one who supported (and supports) these proposals, I do not believe that doing so constitutes the abandoning of the Bible’s authority. Honesty and the commandment not to bear false witness against others requires that we not confuse our disagreements about the meaning of these texts with faithlessness, heresy, or the denial of Scripture’s authority. It is true that the Bible never says a single positive thing about same-gender intercourse." In all honesty and sincerity I ask, how can one say we need to take the scripture seriously, support the ordination of PALMS and then say in the same discussion that the bible never says a single positive thing about same gender intercourse. Did I miss something here? Certainly, God would not make His Word so difficult to understand. For those who wish to read the entire discussion from the N.T. professor at LTSS, you may do so at http://www.sclutheran.org/ELCA-CWA-RESOURCES/PETERSON-Bible-Church-and-Faithful-Discernment.pdf. With all humility I believe that one cannot exegete the texts faithfully and come to his conclusion in support of the changes of CWA 09. I contend as I have before, ELCA is in serious error. All of the interpretive sleight of hand can not dismiss the overwhelming biblical imagery of the primacy of male and female relationships. From Genesis to the words of prophets to the Song of Solomon to the last words of scripture in Revelation, the biblical imagery speaks volumes; always mentioning the primacy of male and female imagery. To use this N.T. professor's words, we must use "the whole witness of scripture." The so called seven texts that deal with same gender sexual relationships are not the only texts to consider, but the whole witness. Sorry, but you cannot make the conclusions the ELCA 600 or so persons voted upon with scripture.

Civility in Dialogue

2009-10-27T16:48:00.002-04:00

I am convinced that the need for civility is more important than ever before in our Church life together. But I also believe that we can become so sentimental as to lose all force of words. I came across this sentence regarding the marriage of priests in my reading of the Smalcald Articles; "Instead, they acted like anti-Christian, tyrannical, wicked scoundrels and thereby gave occasion for all kinds of horrible, abominable, and countless sins…" This is but a sample of the diatribe contained in the writings of the Reformers and especially Dr. Luther. It seems to me when the gospel is in jeopardy one needs strong words. Consider the words of Paul, "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!" Paul goes on to repeat this line verbatim. The gospel is the good news of Jesus Christ. God calls us to new life and obedience under His word. Should we bless anything other than that which is the gospel of Jesus Christ and the life to which we are called, well...ask the Apostle Paul what he thinks.

Open Letter to Core from Pastor Stephen Bouman

2009-10-25T20:28:00.004-04:00

I read Dr. Bouman's letter and found it kind and encouraging in many ways. http://www.elca.org/Who-We-Are/Our-Three-Expressions/Faithful-Mission/Being-Faithful/Bouman-Letter.aspx
He was in attendance at the Lutheran Core event in Indiana. I, too, was there. I admit there were some strong words, but I recall Luther had strong words for those who jeopardized the gospel. I believe, however, that it would have been best if some things had been left unsaid. I do recall, however, hearing a lot about mission. The Core gathering heard passionate pleas from African and Latino ministries and our concern that they continue and be strengthened in mission. And while I respect Dr. Bouman's presence at the Core gathering and his plea for us to work together and not disengage; it is important to note, however, that the ELCA CWA 09 disengaged. About six hundred people persuaded by passionate pleas of deep emotion voted their conscience. They do not represent any of us not present at the CWA 09, but voted for themselves. Therefore, I am voting as well, along with thousands upon thousands of lay, clergy and rostered leaders. We vote no to ministry changes and yes to mission, mission that has integrity with the traditions and interpretations of scripture that have withstood the test of time. When there is a reconfiguration of Lutheranism in North America, I pray that it is done with little rancor and much love.

Mildew Inspection

2009-10-23T16:00:00.003-04:00

Yesterday was an overwhelmingly busy day as I inspected all of my clothing to see if the mildew had spread (Leviticus 13:50). Finding none, I was went about my day as usual. Wait, what am I thinking? I do not normally worry about the midlew in my home any more. But, the scripture has a very elaborate process for the containment of mildew. Now, if we do not adhere to the strict requirements of Holy Scripture regarding mildew surely we would not expect to exact purist standards for any other aspects of our lives, or would we? What methodology do we use to interpret scripture? I was taught all the historical-critical methods of biblical interpretation, redaction, form, and literary criticism as well as other ways to discern what the Holy Word means. To use, however, passages such as the one above in a somewhat dismissive way in reference to moral issues of sexuality, is sad. While the issue of mildew was no doubt a serious issue that deserved the handling of the priest for cleanliness, we do not measure it in the same way as relationships and more serious questions of morality. This, however, does not lessen the seriousness with which we interpret scripture. I subscribe to what I call "universal core principles." This means that there are central principles that guide our discernment of scripture. Jesus summarized all the laws with one, love God and love your neighbor (Mark 12.) The number one guiding principle is how do we love one another and how do we love God. If clearing out mildew helps me love God, I'm on it. Time to go....

Pray More and Love More

2009-10-21T20:25:00.003-04:00

In the midst of all of my frustration, disappointment, sadness, and concern over the ELCA, I am committed to prayer. I honestly cannot see the end of this morass. I frankly and candidly am more upset about the CWA 09 than anything in this church I have faced. It is an issue of authority of scripture, but even more disconcerting to me is the pressure on all congregational pastors. The CWA in all their wisdom suggested that congregations can choose to do what they wish regarding PALMS (Publically Accountable Life-long Monogamous Same Gender Relationships). How are we to do that? Are we to hold forums? Have a vote? What if the pastor and the laity have different strongly held opinions? What if 30% of the congregation thinks it is cause for celebration while 70% hold to Option 1 of HSGT? When the ELCA voted to have a study of human sexuality at the 2001 CWA (Church-Wide Assembly), I was a voting member and I voted against it. I thought then, and still feel this way, that we did not need another study. The LCA, AELC and ALC each had very solid statements. So, here we are being told that we can get along. See this news article from ELCA news service. http://http://www.elca.org/Who-We-Are/Our-Three-Expressions/Churchwide-Organization/Communication-Services/News/Releases.aspx?a=4317 So, I know of nothing else to do at this point, but pray. I need to love as deeply as God can enable me to, especially those with whom I vehemently disagree. Of course, I may also find a little time to articulate my frustration and my biblical exegesis through this medium. Time to pray.

Ads?

2009-10-20T22:31:00.002-04:00

Those of you who read this blog have no doubt noticed the ads. They are here for two reasons. First, they create revenue for my local charity - the Metze College fund. Just the other day I made two cent in one day. Second, they are here to demonstrate my commitment to Capitalism, which I might add is under attack. I say cheers for the free market system. While it is not perfect, it enables people to escape poverty, encourages discipline and personal responsibility and creates some of the most generous philanthropists in the world. So that is what you get for your two cents worth!

The Church of the Reformation - Really?

2009-10-19T22:16:00.005-04:00

What does it mean to belong to the church of the Reformation? It means that we are always reforming, always monitoring ourselves to be sure that we are faithful to God's Holy Word. Frankly, I am pretty tired of the idea that God could give us His Word only to speak against His Word a few years later. For instance, in 1993 the conference of Bishops of the ELCA issued a statement that said, "There is no basis in Scripture or tradition for an official ceremony by this church for the blessing of same-sex unions, but nevertheless, we express trust in and will continue dialogue with those pastors and congregations who are in ministry with gay and lesbian persons, and affirm their desire to explore the best ways to provide pastoral care for all to whom they minister." http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/New-or-Returning-to-Church/Dig-Deeper/Homosexuality-and-the-ELCA.aspx This is a good statement that prevents individuals from being marginalized who have same-sex attractions, but it states a clear word. Yet, in a mere 16 years we are now enlightened. So in accordance with CWA 09, there will be no blessing ceremony, but we will allow PALMS to serve as ordained pastors even though their relationship has no basis in scripture. Is this reforming? Suppose in twenty years the population of the planet is so great that we deem it necessary to cut off life spans at ninety years of age. Consider that reasonable people believe this to be the right and proper thing to do. If that is the "experiential" thing to do, would we kill all persons 91 years of age and older? Of course not. Why? God has something to say about murder. I am tired of issues being diverted by words like semper reformanda, as well as referring to women's ordination or slavery or mold and mildew (see Leviticus). Stick to the issue at hand. Is sex between any two adults in a consenting relationship permissable? Oops, better rephrase that as incest could fit that definition. According to the Word of God, God blesses sexual relationships between one man and one woman. No one has seriously dealt with Genesis chapter one and two, Romans chapter one or Matthew 19:4-6. Check out Robert Gagnon's website for a thorough biblical exegesis. Compare that in all fairness to the slippery exegesis (of course that is my opinion - what else do you expect on this blog) of the arguments on the Soulforce website. The truth is ELCA does not care to deal with this truth, but rather wants to allow the culture of the world to affect the teachings of the church. The church is using our greatest asset, our compassion for all people, to distort the clear teaching of scripture. And that boils my blood. This is not what we mean by semper reformanda. Always reforming means being transformed by the Word as the Holy Spirit enlightens us. Errors creep in to human institutions and numerous false teachings have crept into ELCA. Marcionism, antinomianism, universalism, and more can sneak in and even be codified as official church teaching. If we are serious about allowing the traditional view, the orthodox view to be heard and not silenced in this church, then I intend to do my part.

Blog Names

2009-10-18T13:31:00.003-04:00

I am relatively new at blogging having started only recently. This blog had two previous names and now, perhaps, the final one. So, for those of you wondering what I am doing with name changes, bear with me. I am having a fair amount of fun, but also realize that sarcasm can often come across as far too critical. While there will continue to be moments of dripping sarcasm, I realize that theological issues are serious business and deserve devoted and prayerful reflection. Sadly, the debates that have lit up the blogosphere regarding PALMS (Publicly Accountable Life-long, Monogamous, Same Gender Relationships) is painful to a lot of families and people that many, if not all of us, know. So, what needs to be said clearly, is that God's love extends to all people. I find myself, on the one hand, feeling remorse for those persons about whom much of our debate centers, and on the other hand, deep sadness at our lack of respect for God's Holy Word. As a pastor and theologian, I am attempting to strike the balance. A balance that I believe Jesus held to closely. Jesus deeply loved all persons, but never lowered the standards of ethical conduct. It is not easy being a pastor in the ELCA these days. It was hard enough, but the CWA 09 made it extremely stressful for the orthodox among us.

What Holy Scripture will we read?

2009-10-16T04:32:00.006-04:00

So if the Social Statement, "Human Sexuality, Gift and Trust," states that the marriage between a man and a woman is normative, and the CWA 09 did not approve the "blessing" (see link in previous post on "Rite of Blessing") of PALMS (Publicly Accountable Lifelong Monogamous same gender Relationships), then what in the world will a recognition and support ceremony look like? I cannot wait to see this ceremony (no sarcasm there -well maybe not much). What scripture reading will be recommended? Let's see Genesis 2:4ff will not suffice. What about Leviticus 18; probably not. Hosea three might make for interesting reading, but it is filled too with images of male and female sexual relations; guess not. Romans chapter one will certainly not do as even Dr. Walter Wink cannot wrangle his way out of that one. Oops, better not read 1 Corinthians 6 for it is a little too clear. Unless, of course, you have the Lutheran Study Bible -National Youth Gathering ELCA version. There the study note takes care of the little unpleasantries of that text. Yikes, better not select 1 Timothy 3 either. Surely, we could read from the last book of the bible and all the end time stuff. What about Revelation 21? There it is again all that husband and wife language. Seems to me there is a common thread running through the entire scripture; a thread that uses male and female imagery as normative. So, what will we read at this ceremony? Perhaps revisionists can do us all a favor and write some new scripture, after all is not the canon open? That seems like the "experiential" thing to do. Hey, that gives me an idea for a new name.

A rite of blessing?

2009-10-15T22:06:00.003-04:00

Clearly, the misinformation in the press and even among clergy is rampant. At one of our synodical meetings, I noted that the church in no place mentioned the word bless. I was told by one of our officials that blessing was implied. Here are the exact words on the ELCA website;

Does this mean the ELCA has endorsed the blessing of same-gender unions?No, the assembly was not asked to consider and thus took no action concerning a churchwide rite of blessing. The assembly’s action means that a congregation, however, is permitted to find ways to hold publicly accountable same-gender relationships that intend to be lifelong and monogamous and to surround these couples and their families with prayer and support in a variety of ways. The action adopted does not require any congregation to do so. The fourth resolution does require public accountability of anyone in such a relationship who seeks to be an ELCA pastor, deaconess, diaconal minister, or associate in ministry.

http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements-in-Process/JTF-Human-Sexuality/cwafaqs.aspx